Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2017 Month : September-October Volume : 6 Issue : 4 Page : AO31 - AO34 Full Version

Morphometric Study of Maxillary Air Sinus using Computed Tomography


Deepak Bhusal, Prajna Paramita Samanta, Vishal Gupta, Poonam Kharb
1. Student, Department of Anatomy, Schoolof Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, UP, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, UP, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, UP, India. 4. Professor, Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, UP, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prajna Paramita Samanta,
103, 2nd Floor, Block 3, Eros Garden, Surajkund Road,
Faridabad-121009, Haryana, India.
E-mail: prajnap.samanta@sharda.ac.in
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Maxillary air sinus is the largest paranasal air sinus. It exhibits dimorphic features and remains intact in victims who are incinerated therefore it can be used for identification of individual and gender determination. CT is most reliable method for measurements of maxillary sinus dimensions and anatomical variations related to it.

Aim: The present study was conducted to find out the volume and maximum Anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the maxillary air sinus and the anatomical variations related to it.

Materials and Methods: CT images of 100 healthy adults were subjected to the measurements of volume and maximum AP diameter of right and left maxillary air sinus using Autocontour software. Student’s ‘t’-test was used to find out significant difference between males and females.

Results: The volume of right and left maxillary sinuses in males were found to be 12.95±4.48 cm3, 13.26±3.94 cm3, and in females 10.59±3.37 cm3, 10.16±2.92 cm3 respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between volume of right and left maxillary sinuses in males and females. Maximum AP diameters of right and left maxillary sinuses in males were 37.31±4.62 mm, 37.74±3.59 mm and in females were 36.15±3.92 mm, 35.57±3.50 mm respectively. Statistically significant difference was observed between the maximum AP diameter of males and females for left maxillary sinus.

Conclusion: The results of the present study and knowledge of variations in maxillary sinus as seen in computed tomographic scans will help in identification of individual, sex determination and minimizing risks during surgery.
Keywords : Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Gender determination, Hypoplasia, Maxillary sinus parameters
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2017/30950:2324

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2017
 
INTRODUCTION

Paranasal air sinuses are complex anatomical structures situated within the frontal, maxilla, ethmoid and sphenoid bone and shows a significant inter-individual variation. Maxillary air sinus is the largest paranasal sinus (1). The maxillary sinus exhibits dimorphic features therefore it can be used for identification of an individual (2). In forensic medicine identification of individuals from skeletal remains and decomposing parts is one of the most difficult task. For gender determination long bones, bony pelvis and skull are conventionally used (3),(4),(5). Maxillary sinus remains intact in victims who are incinerated, although other bones of skull may be disfigured therefore it can be used for identification of sex of individuals (2),(3),(6). The shape and size of maxillary sinus differ between males and females and in various populations (7). The methods for measuring the dimensions of maxillary sinus have been changed from cadaveric skull measurements to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with the advances in medical techniques [8-10]. Because of loss in mucosa and other soft tissue in cadavers, Keywords: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Gender determination, Hypoplasia, Maxillary sinus parameters the volume measurement of maxillary sinus from cadaveric skull will be larger than the actual size. Measurements of maxillary sinus can be more accurate with CT as craniometric points can be precisely located (11). Helical CT presents a lot of advantages as compared to other methods such as conventional radiographs (12). Therefore, the present study was conducted to find out the normal dimensions of the maxillary air sinus and the anatomical variations related to it.
 
 
Material and Methods

This was prospective cross-sectional study conducted in Department of Anatomy and Department of Radiodiagnosis, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Noida, India, from 1st July 2016 to 31st January 2017 after approval of Institution ethics committee. CT images of 100 adults (20-80 years) of either sex were obtained out of which 54 were males and 46 were females. CT images of patients with fractures of face and paranasal sinus, chronic sinusitis, sinonasal malignancy, septal deviation, cleft palate, ectopic and supernumerary teeth were excluded from the study. All the CT-scans were non contrast. All the CT-scan images were obtained through the 128 slice CT scanner (OPTIMA 660, GE Medical System) with the slice thickness of 0.6 mm and images were displayed in all three planes i.e., axial, coronal and sagittal using AW volume share workstation. Images were first subjected to bony alignment of maxillary sinus cavity. Autocontour software was used for the measurement of volume and maximum AP diameter as it gives accurate measurement of irregular structure like maxillary sinus. Volume of maxillary sinuses were obtained from all three views i.e., axial, sagittal and coronal whereas, the maximum AP diameter (longest distance between the most anterior point to the most posterior point) of Right (R) and Left (L) sinuses were measured in axial images.

Statistical analysis

Window Excel sheet version 2007 and IBM SPSS software version 21.0 were used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics, namely mean and standard deviation were calculated. Normality of data was analysed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Independent sample ‘t’-test was done to assess statistical difference between measured parameters of maxillary sinuses between males and females. Paired ‘t’-test was used to assess statistical difference between right and left maxillary sinuses.
 
 
Results

The volume of maxillary sinuses were found to be larger in males compared to females. The volume of right and left maxillary sinuses in males were found to be 12.95±4.48 cm3 , 13.26±3.94 cm3 and in females10.59±3.37 cm3 , 10.16±2.92 cm3 respectively. A statistically significant difference (p=0.004) and (p=0.001) were observed between volume of right and left maxillary sinuses in males and females. The maximum AP diameter of maxillary sinuses were also found to be larger in males than in females. The maximum AP diameter of right and left maxillary sinuses in males were 37.31±4.62 mm, 37.74±3.59 mm and in females were 36.15±3.92 mm, 35.57±3.50 mm respectively (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2). Statistically significant difference was observed between the maximum AP diameter of males and females for left maxillary sinus (p=0.003) where p<0.05 was considered statistically significant (Table/Fig 3).

In the present study three cases of maxillary sinus hypoplasia were observed (Table/Fig 4). Hypoplasia of maxillary sinuses were determined by subtracting two standard deviation from normal mean of volume and maximum AP diameter (i.e., mean±2SD). All the hypoplastic sinuses had normal mucosa and were not associated with anomalies of uncinate process.
 
 
Discussion

CT-scans provide valuable data about the anatomical details of the paranasal sinus. Males usually have larger maxillary sinuses as compared to females (14). In the present study the volume of maxillary sinuses in males were found to be significantly larger than in females.

Szilvassy J et al., (14) and Sharma SK et al., (3) reported that the left maxillary sinus is larger than the right sinus in both males and females. According to Priner S et al., the volume of right maxillary sinus was higher in males whereas, in females volume of left maxillary sinus was higher (15). In our study it was observed the volume of left maxillary sinus were higher than right in males whereas, in females the volume of right maxillary sinus were slightly larger than left maxillary sinus.

In the present study the volume of right and left maxillary sinuses were found to be less for both males and females as compared to the other studies (Table/Fig 5).

The AP diameter of maxillary sinuses were found to be more in the present study as compared to the studies done by Sharma SK et al., (3) and less than the studies conducted by Kim HJ et al., (16), Prabhat N et al., (17) and Souza AD et al., (19) (Table/Fig 6).Various factors such as sample size, different ethnic and racial groups, genetic factors, environmental factors, past infections of maxillary sinuses may be responsible for the variations in the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinus in these studies.

Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia (MSH) is a very uncommon condition. It has been reported that the hypoplastic maxillary sinuses are usually associated with hypoplastic or absence of uncinate process (20),(21). Bolger WE et al., classified MSH into three types i.e., Type I with normal uncinate process, welldefined infundibular passage and mild sinus hypoplasia; Type II with absence or hypoplasia of uncinate process, significant hypoplasia of sinus and ill defined infundibular passage; and Type III with absence of uncinate process, profoundly hypoplastic sinus (21). In the present study no uncinate process abnormalities were observed in hypoplastic maxillary sinuses which corresponds to Type I MSH. Identification of anomalies of uncinate process in patients with sinus hypoplasia is very important because uncinate process serve as important landmark during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).

Similar to the previous studies, the volume and AP diameter of maxillary sinus was found to be more in males compared to females. Volume and maximum AP diameter of normal maxillary sinuses may be useful for gender determination in forensic medicine and criminal investigations when other methods of sexing are not conclusive. It will also help the physician in correlating the clinical and radiological findings for diseases of maxillary sinus and surgical interventions.

LIMITATION

The limitations of the present study are small sample size due to limited duration of the study, restricted accessibility, high radiation exposure to the patients. Further, studies on larger sample size are needed to confirm the finding of the present study.
 
 
Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that anatomic variability exists between genders. Maximum AP diameter and volume of the maxillary sinus was found to be higher in males as compared to females. Right maxillary sinus volume and maximum AP diameter were larger than left sinus in males whereas left maxillary sinus volume and maximum AP diameter were larger than right sinus in females. Therefore, knowledge of average volume and maximum AP diameter of maxillary sinus of healthy adults and their variations as seen in CT-scans will help in gender determination. It will also help in minimizing risks during surgery by providing precise information of the surrounding structures.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Standring S, Anand N, Birch R, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gleeson M, et al. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical practice. 41st ed. Elsevier; 2016. Pages 565-69.
2.
Tambawala SS, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, Prakash N. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;6(2):120-25.
3.
Sharma SK, Jehan M, Kumar A. Measurements of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions by computed tomography for gender determination. J Anat Soc India. 2014;63:36-42.
4.
Jasim HH, Al-Taei JA. Computed tomographic measurement of maxillary sinus volume and dimension in correlation to the age and gender (comparative study among individuals with dentate and endentulous maxilla). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2013;25(1):87-93.
5.
Khangura RK, Sircar K, Singh S, Rastogi V. Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences. 2011;3(2):81.
6.
Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, Canturk G. Determination of gender by measuring the size of maxillary sinuses in CT scans. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:9-13.
7.
Masri AA, Yusof A, Hassan R. A three dimensional Computed Tomography (3D-CT): A study of maxillary sinus in Malays. Can J Basic Appl Sci. 2013;1(2):125-34.
8.
Gosau M, Rink DD, Driemei O, Draenert FG. Maxillary sinus anatomy: a cadaveric study with clinical implications. The Anatomical Record. 2009;292(3):352-54.
9.
Abd-alla MA, Mahdi AJ. Maxillary sinus measurements in different age groups of human cadavers. Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences. 2013;1:107-12.
10.
Adibelli ZH, Songu M, Adibelli H. Paranasal sinus development in children: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy. 2011;25(1):30-35.
11.
Vidya CS, Shamasundar NM, Manjunatha B, Raichurkar K. Evaluation of size and volume of maxillary sinus to determine gender by 3D computerized tomography scan method using dry skulls of South Indian origin. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2013;5(3):97.
12.
Tatlisumak E, Asirdizer M, Yavuz MS. Theory and applications of CT imaging and analysis. Usability of CT images of frontal sinus in forensic personal identification. In Tech. 2011. pages:257- 67.
13.
Fernandes CL. Volumetric analysis of maxillary sinuses of Zulu and European crania by helical, multislice Computed Tomography. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:877-81.
14.
Szilvassy J. The importance of the rontgenologic methods for the prehistoric and recent history excavation areas. Up-to-date problems of the fominit evolution-Veröff. Uberse-Mus Bremen. 1987;9:79-128.
15.
Pirner S, Tingelhoff K, Wagner I, Westphal R, Rilk M, Wahl FM, et al. CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses. European Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. 2009;266(4):507-18.
16.
Kim HJ, Yoon HR, Kim HD, Kang MK, Kwak HH, Park HD, et al. Personal computer based three dimensional reconstructions and simulation of maxillary sinus. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24(6):393- 99.
17.
Prabhat M, Rai S, Kaur M, Prabhat K, Bhatnagar P, Panjwani S. Computed tomography based forensic gender determination by measuring the size and volume of the maxillary sinuses. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences. 2016;8(1):40-46.
18.
Urooge A, Patil BA. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus: A morphometric analysis using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(3):67-70.
19.
Souza AD, Rajagopal AV, Ankolekar VH, Souza AS, Kotian SR. Anatomy of maxillary sinus and its ostium: A radiological study using computed tomography. CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research. 2016;3(1):37.
20.
Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Danaei SM, Salehi S, Hamedani S. Evaluation of anatomic variations in maxillary sinus with the aid of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in a population in south of Iran. Journal of Dentisty. 2016:17(1)7-15.
21.
Bolger WE, Woodruff WW, Morehead J, Parsons DS. Maxillary sinus hypoplasia: Classification and description of associated uncinate process hypoplasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Sug. 1990;103:759-65.  [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *