Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2018 Month : September-October Volume : 7 Issue : 4 Page : RO46 - RO51 Full Version

Role of Ultrasonography in Evaluation of Pathologies of Posterior Segment of the Orbit


Garima Rajimwale, Pratap Singh Parihar, Shrikant Rajimwale, Suresh Phatak
1. Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra , India. 2. Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra , India. 3. Registrar, Medical Council of India, Medical Council of India, Raipur, Chattisgarh, India. 4. Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra , India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Garima Rajimwale,
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical
College, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra-442005, India.
E-mail: garimananu@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: B-mode ultrasonography provides a good anatomical background and helps to rule out various pathologic conditions that affect the posterior segment of the eye. It can guide the ophthalmologist in diagnosing disease and choosing treatment.

Aim: To study the role of B-scan ultrasound in posterior segment pathology of eye.

Materials and Methods: A total of 92 patients with complaints of diminution of vision, were subjected to clinical Ophthalmological examination and B scan USG to look for the presence of retinal, vitreous and choroidal pathologies. High resolution USG was done with machine (Hitachi Arietta S70) equipped with a 12-18 MHz real-time high-frequency probe and colour Doppler was used when required for further evaluation. The final diagnosis was made by correlating the USG findings with clinical diagnosis and statistical values were calculated accordingly.

Results: Most of the patients presented with retinal detachment, n=45 (48.91%), vitreous haemorrhage, n=43 (46.73%) followed by vitreous degeneration, n=12 (16.30%). Choroid detachment was seen in 6 patients (6.52%) followed by Melanoma in 2 patients (2.17%) and Panophthalmitis in 1 patient (1.09%). The sensitivity of USG was 97.7% and specificity was 80% among patients with statistical significance (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The present study shows that B- scan was useful for accurately diagnosing 92 patients, out of which 86 (93.47%) cases had some pathology while 6 (6.52%) patients were found normal. It also shows the utility of B-scan for evaluating the posterior segment in the presence of opaque ocular media.
Keywords : B scan ultrasonography, Ocular abnormalities
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2018/37960:2443

Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2018

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:None.
 
INTRODUCTION

The slit-lamp examination and fundoscopy are the basis of diagnosis in most of the patients with eye disease. However, in cases where the media is opaque or cataractous change prevents the visualization of posterior segment, ultrasonography (US) helps in assessment of a variety of ocular diseases (1). It can guide the radiologist and ophthalmologist in diagnosing disease and choosing method of treatment.

B-scan (Brightness modulation scan) is a two dimensional ultrasonography technique which uses high frequency sound waves. It can be safely performed in outdoor patient without any use of anaesthetics or sedative therapy (2). It is useful for a better demonstration of the shape and topographic relationship of lesions in the posterior segment.

B-scan provides a good anatomical background and helps to rule out retinal, vitreous, choroidal detachments, tumours, and other pathologic conditions that affect the posterior segment of the eye (2),(3). The purpose of this study was to visualize the status of posterior segment of eye with B-scan ultrasound and to find out any posterior segment lesion in such cases.
 
 
Material and Methods

The present prospective study was undertaken for a period of two years, from July 2016 to June 2018 and it included patients referred for high resolution ultrasonography from the Department of Ophthalmology. A total of 92 patients were subjected to clinical Ophthalmological examination and B-scan USG. Institutional ethical clearance was obtained (DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2016-17/5014). Patients who were diagnosed or suspected of posterior segment pathology with opaque or clear media, patients with blunt trauma to eye, patients presenting with proptosis and patients suspected or diagnosed intraocular tumours were included in this study. Patient who had active painful ocular surface infection with extrusion of intraocular contents, or patients who recently underwent surgery were excluded from the study.

The examinations were performed in B-mode USG with machine (Hitachi Arietta S70) equipped with a 12-18 MHz real-time high-frequency probe and colour Doppler was used when required for further evaluation.

Procedure was explained to the patients and they were placed in a supine position and asked to close both the eyes. The scan was performed after applying coupling gel. The patient was instructed to move the eye ball upwards, downwards, nasal side and temporal side for delineating better anatomy of the eye ball and mobility of intra-ocular lesions. Both eyes were scanned serially in transverse and sagittal planes. After examination, excessive gel was wiped out with sterile cotton. Images were obtained from the device and studied for evaluation. The final diagnosis was made by correlating the B-scan USG findings with that of clinical history and clinical diagnosis.
 
 
Results

(Table/Fig 1) shows that male patient were major in age group 41-50 years (24.56%) while female patients were maximum in age group 51-60 years (28.57%).

(Table/Fig 2) shows that majority of the patients had abnormal USG findings (93.47%) while 6 (6.53%) showed normal findings without any pathology. Most of the patients presented with vitreous haemorrhage (46.73%) followed by vitreous degeneration (16.30%). The other vitreous pathology included vitreous detachment (13.03%), dislocated lens in vitreous (7.61%), endophthalmitis (3.26%), PHPV (2.17%) and Asteriodhyalosis (2.17%).

(Table/Fig 3) shows that majority of patients presented with retinal detachment (48.91%) followed by sub-retinal collection (8.69%) The other retinal pathology includes retinal cyst (3.26%), retinoblastoma (2.17%), diabetic retinopathy (1.09%) and retinoschisis (1.09%).

Subretinal collection was found in association with seven cases of traumatic retinal detachment and one case in association with diabetic retinopathy.

(Table/Fig 4) shows that majority of the patients presented with choroid detachment (6.52%) followed by Melanoma (2.17%) and Panophthalmitis (1.09%).

(Table/Fig 5) shows various miscellaneous USG findings. Majority of patients presented with cataract (5.43%) followed by foreign body (4.35%), optic neuritis (3.26%), Pthysisbulbi (3.26%), globe rupture (1.09%).

In the age group upto 10 years of age, 2 patients were diagnosed with retinoblastoma, 2 patients with a history of trauma, had retinal detachment and 1 another with trauma had vitreous haemorrhage, 1 patient had optic neuritis with micro-ophthalmia, 1 patient had coloboma with persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous and 2 were found to be normal.

(Table/Fig 6) shows that the sensitivity of USG was 97.7% and specificity was 80% among patients with statistical significance (p<0.001).

Few cases of the various pathologies of posterior segment of the orbit found in the present study were shown in (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14).
 
 
Discussion

In present study, ocular abnormalities were common in male (61.95%) patients than female patients (38.04%). Ocular abnormalities are believed to be more common in males than in females. In a study done by OP Sharma et al., the sex ratio was 2:1 (3). Chaudhari H et al., studied role of ultrasonography in evaluation of orbital lesions and observed that out of 100 patients 58 patients were male and 42 were female (4). Ocular abnormalities were observed commonly among 41-60 years age group. In a study done by OP Sharma et al., ocular abnormalities were observed maximum in 4th to 5th decades (3).

In the present study, most of the patients presented with vitreous haemorrhage (46.73%) followed by vitreous degeneration (16.30%). Retinal detachment was seen in 45 (48.91%) patients. Study by Sharma OP et al., on 122 cases revealed vitreous haemorrhage as the most common intraocular pathology (41.17%) followed by retinal detachment (26.4%) (3). However, in the study by Ahmed J et al., most cases were of Vitreous Haemorrhage (29%) followed by Retinal Detachment (25%) (5). In a study by Haile M et al., the most common abnormality was retinal detachment (39%) followed by vitreous opacities (31%) (6) whereas, in another study Coleman DJ showed 25% incidence of RD (7).

In one of the patients, we found retinoschisis, which is considered to be a different entity from retinal detachment, in the form that retinoschisis is characterized by splitting of the neurosensory retina, at the outer plexiform layer. B-scan echography can be used to differentiate between retinal detachment and retinoschisis. A rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is flattened by scleral indentation as the subretinal fluid is forced into the vitreous cavity through the retinal break, while in retinoschisis, flattening occurs because there is no direct communication between the retinoschisis cavity and the vitreous space (8).

Choroidal abnormalities included maximum cases of choroid detachment (6.52%) followed by Melanoma (2.17%) and Panophthalmitis (1.09%). In a study by Agrawal R et al., choroidal abnormalities included maximum cases of choroidal detachment (80%), while rest 20% cases were of choroidal haemorrhage (9).

In the present study, the sensitivity of USG was 97.7% and specificity was 80% among patients with statistical significance (p<0.001). Coleman DJ et al., in his review of 100 cases also showed 100% specificity and sensitivity of B mode ultrasonography in detecting and characterizing intra-ocular lesions. In his review of 18 cases, 17 cases were immediately diagnosed, and one suspected case was diagnosed after a long term surveillance which proved it to be an intra-ocular tumour true to the suspicion made with B mode ultrasonography (10).

Vitreous Haemorrhage: Vitreous haemorrhage is a major cause of diminution of vision and may also lead to blindness. On USG, it presents as echogenic material in the posterior chamber. This appearance depends on the age and severity of the haemorrhage. Fresh haemorrhages are seen as small dots or linear areas of low reflective mobile opacities in the vitreous, whereas in older haemorrhages, blood organizes to form membranes of low to medium level reflectivity (11).

Endopthalmitis and Panopthalmitis: Endopthalmitis appeared as free mobile dots, associated with thickening of the ocular coat (>3 mm). In panopthalmitis there is oedematous fluid in tenon space, seen as a black ring surrounding the highly echogenic sclera along with thickening of optic nerve void. This is called as the “T” sign; the arm of the “T” is formed by oedema in the tenons space and the stem by the optic nerve void (12).

Detachments (14): The various detachments can be Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD), Retinal Detachment (RD) and Choroidal Detachment (CD). The differentiating features are summarized in (Table/Fig 15).

Intraocular Tumours Retinoblastoma: This is one of the commonest tumours of childhood. A pineal tumour (pineoblastoma) with bilateral retinoblastoma is called trilateral retinoblastoma. They can be endophytic or exophytic. Clinically the child has leukokoria. On ultrasound the tumour has variable echogenicity with posterior acoustic enhancement and smooth, dome or irregular shape. Calcification within the tumour is characteristic. This differentiates it from other causes of leukokoria in childhood like PHPV (14).

Choroidal Melanoma: This is one of the most common intraocular tumours of adults. The imaging findings are characteristic and diagnostic. On ultrasound, it appears as a homogenous low to medium echogenicity tumour having a dome shaped or collar button shape with base over choroid. The collar button shape indicates break in Bruch’s membrane. It is pathognomic of melanoma. Internal vascularity is a very important differentiating feature which is absent in most melanoma mimics, like choroidal haemangiomas or choroidal nevi (14).

LIMITATION

B-scan was not useful in diagnosing orbital fractures. False positive results may be found in the presence of gas bubbles and sub retinal haemorrhages. False negative results may be observed in cases of fibrotic tissue and small lesions. It is a less sensitive modality for identification of bony involvement of a tumour, its extension to adjacent structures and brain. B scan does play a major role in diagnosis specifically the pathologies of posterior segment of eye however in few of the situations, B scan fails to differentiate between various pathologies e.g., between thick vitreous and retinal detachment. B scan cannot be used in open globe injury.
 
 
Conclusion

The B-mode ultrasonography should be the first screening modality in evaluation of posterior segment lesions. It provides excellent quality real time imaging of various ocular pathologies.

It can be extensively used in evaluation of retinal disorders, like retinal detachment, retinal masses and also diagnostic in patients with opaque ocular media and diminution of vision, where a preoperative fundoscopic evaluation is virtually impossible, for assessment of the posterior segment.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Byrne SF, Green RL. Ultrasound of the eye and orbit, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, 2002:544.
2.
Sushil K, Ruchi G. Diagnostic ultrasonography of the eye. All India Ophthalmological Society. 2011; CME series No. 24.17- 19.
3.
Sharma OP. Orbital sonography with its clinico-surgical correlation. Ind J RadiolImag. 2005;15(4):537–54.
4.
Chaudhari H, Thakkar GN, Gandhi VS, Darji PJ, Banker HK, Rajwadi H. Role of ultrasonography in evaluation of orbital lesions. Gujarat Medical Journal. 2013;68(2):73-78.
5.
Ahmed J, Shaikh FF, Rizwan A, Memon MF. Evaluation of vitreoretinal pathologies using b-scan ultrasound. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2009;25(4):01-05.
6.
Haile M, Mengistu Z. B-scan ultrasonography in ophthalmic diseases. East Afr Med J. 1996;73(11):703-07.
7.
Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Lizzi FL, Rondeau MJ, Lloyd HO, Daly SW, et al. Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Pennsylvania, 2005.
8.
Boldt HC, Brown DM, McGeorge AJ. Echographic diagnosis of degenerative retinoschisis facilitated by scleral indentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:123-24.
9.
Agrawal R, Ahirwal S. A study of role of B scan ultrasound in posterior segment pathology of eye. Int J Med Res Rev. 2015;3(9):969-74.
10.
Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Lizzi FL, Rondeau MJ. Ultrasonography of Eye and Orbit. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006; 47-122.
11.
Fielding JA. The assessment of ocular injury by ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(4):301-12.
12.
Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Tosi R, Castagna G. Ultrasonographic findings in endophthalmitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.1995;73(5):446-49.
13.
Polo MD, Lluís AT, Segura OP, Bosque AA, Appiani CE, Mitjana JMC. Ocular ultrasonography focused on the posterior eye segment: what radiologists should know. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:351-64.
14.
Aironi VD, Chougule S, Khetarpal S, Bhati G. Retinoblastoma: A spectrum of manifestations in three cases on B-scan. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2007;17(1):11-14.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8] [Table/Fig-9] [Table/Fig-10] [Table/Fig-11] [Table/Fig-12] [Table/Fig-13] [Table/Fig-14] [Table/Fig-15]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *