Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case report

Year :2020 Month : September-October Volume : 9 Issue : 4 Page : RC01 - RC03 Full Version

Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Antenatal Sonographic Diagnosis-A Case Report


Amandeep Singh, Sonali Malik
1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, SGRD Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, India. 2. Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, SGRD Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Amandeep Singh,
469, East Mohan Nagar, Sultanwind Road, Amritsar-143001, Punjab, India.
E-mail: dr.amancs@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS) is a complication seen in monochorionic pregnancies due to unbalanced vascular anastomosis in placenta. It results in high perinatal mortality, thereby, warranting an early diagnosis. It has an incidence of 1-3 per 10,000 births. A case of TTTS is presented which was diagnosed on fetal ultrasound at 20 weeks of gestation. The donor twin had oligohydramnios with collapsed urinary bladder throughout the examination. The recipient twin had polyhydramnios, mitral as well as tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary artery stenosis, high resistance flow in the umblical artery, reversal of A wave in ductus venosus and fetal ascites. To make the diagnosis of TTTS there should be a presence of monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy with polyhydramnios in the recipient twin and oligohydramnios in the donor twin.
Keywords : Monochorionic, Polyhydraminos, Ultrasound
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2020/45098:2561

Date of Submission: May 18, 2020
Date of Peer Review: May 29, 2020
Date of Acceptance: Jun 15, 2020
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2020

b#bAuthor Declaration:b?b

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None

• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes

• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
 
Case Report

A 20-year-old healthy primigravida presented to the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging of the Institute for second trimester anomaly scan. Her gestational age was 20 weeks 1 day according to her last menstrual periods. There was no significant or relevant past medical or surgical history. The patient was afebrile with blood pressure of 110/86 mmHg, heart rate of 78/minute, respiratory rate of 19/minute and SpO2 of 99%. The ultrasound examination revealed two live intrauterine fetuses separated by a thin membrane separating the two. The placenta was single and was along the posterior wall of uterus. The fetus towards right side of mother was labelled as twin A. It was seen in cephalic presentation and had mean gestational age according to ultrasonographic biometry of 18 weeks 4 days±10 days and estimated fetal weight of 247±36 grams.

The amniotic fluid was reduced with single deepest cord free vertical pocket of 1.9 cm. The fetal heart rate on M mode was 150-160 bpm. Fetal heart situs and axis was normal. The four chamber view showed normal symmetry of the chambers. Three vessel views showed normal orientation and size of the main pulmonary artery, aorta and the superior vena cava. The Right and Left Ventricular Outflow Tracts (RVOT and LVOT) were normal. No evidence of valvular regurgitation was seen. Ductus venosus showed normal waveform on spectral Doppler. The fetal kidneys appeared normal. The fetal urinary bladder was seen in collapsed state during the one hour course of examination (Table/Fig 1). No evidence of oedema, pleural effusion or fetal ascites was seen.

The fetus towards left side of mother was labelled as twin B. It was seen in transverse lie with mean gestational age according to ultrasonographic biometry of 19 weeks±10 days and estimated fetal weight of 347±51 grams. The fetal heart rate on M mode was 137-147 bpm. The amniotic fluid was on higher side with single deepest cord free vertical pocket of 8.2 cm. Fetal heart size was enlarged with cardio-thoracic ratio of 0.65. It was normal in situs, position and axis. On four chamber view, the right ventricle of fetal heart showed thickened echogenic walls- suggestive of hypertrophy. The left ventricle showed mild thickening of its walls. There was thickening with raised echogenicity of the tricuspid valve leaflets- suggestive of dysplastic valve with evidence of tricuspid regurgitation seen on Color Flow Imaging (CFI) (Table/Fig 2). Mitral valve also appeared echogenic with evidence of mild mitral regurgitation (Table/Fig 3). RVOT appeared narrowed with smaller diameter of the pulmonary artery in comparison to the aorta on three vessel view- suggestive of pulmonary artery stenosis (Table/Fig 4). Spectral Doppler showed reversal of flow on CFI. LVOT appeared grossly normal. Colour doppler revealed high resistance flow in the umblical artery with Resistive Index (RI) -0.88, Pulsatility Index (PI)- 2.09 and systolic/diastolic (S/D)- 8.53. However, no reversal of end diastolic flow was seen (Table/Fig 5). Ductus venosus showed reversal of A wave on spectral Doppler (Table/Fig 6). Umblical vein showed pulsatile flow. Urinary bladder of fetus was normally visualised. There was free fluid seen in fetal peritoneal cavity (Table/Fig 7).

On the basis of the above findings, a diagnosis of TTTS was made with twin A as donor and twin B as recipient. The mother got the pregnancy terminated at 20 weeks after consultation with the treating obstetrician.
 
 
Discussion

TTTS is the result of intrauterine blood transfusion from one twin (donor) to another twin (recipient) (1). It occurs in multiple gestation and involves chronic flow of blood from one twin to its co-twin, the prevalence of TTTS is approximately 1 to 3 per 10,000 births (2). The aetiology is suggested to be an imbalance in the formation of arterial and venous connections of both fetuses with a single placenta. It is associated with a high perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity and high incidence of long term neurodevelopmental morbidity in survivors (3).

The diagnosis of TTTS requires the presence of monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy, weight discrepancy between the fetuses (difference more than 20%) and oligohydramnios in one sac and polyhydramnios in the other. Oligohydramnios is defined as a maximal vertical pocket of <2 cm and polyhydramnios is defined as a maximal vertical pocket of >8 cm. Timely detection of TTTS is needed before severe complications occur, such as preterm fetal hydrops, prelabour rupture of membranes, preterm delivery or intrauterine fetal death (4).

Quintero staging system is a useful tool for describing the severity of TTTS. Stage I includes oligohydramnios in one sac and polyhydramnios in the other sac. In stage II, fetal bladder in the donor twin is not visualised which is suggestive of anuria. Abnormal doppler wave forms are seen in stage III. Stage IV includes fetal hydrops. Intrauterine death of a single fetus occurs in stage V (5).

In this case, the donor twin was in Quintero stage II and the recipient twin was in Quintero stage III as there was oligohydramnios and collapsed urinary bladder in the donor twin and polyhydramnios with abnormal doppler findings and cardiac changes were detected in the recipient twin.

In about half the cases, the heart is enlarged due to an increased myocardial thickness (6). Tricuspid regurgitation occurs in about 30%-50% of recipients but is severe in only half of these. Mitral regurgitation on the other hand is much less frequent (6%-14% of cases) yet usually severe. In this case, the recipient twin shows ventricular hypertrophy with associated tricuspid and mitral valve regurgitation. Once a TTTS occurs, the findings tend to progress over time. There occurs worsening of ventricular hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction, which ultimately lead to fetal hydrops and intrauterine fetal demise (7). Options for treatment of TTTS include Serial Amnioreduction (SA) fetoscopic laser coagulation of communicating vessels, septostomy, and termination (8). Fetoscopic laser coagulation of communicating vessels is the standard therapy of treatment (9). The treatment differs and it depends on the gestational age and stage at the time of diagnosis. Many factors like the response to treatment, growth of fetus and progression of disease determines the timing of delivery. Still, the median gestational age at delivery for the majority of the studies which used laser treatment was 33-34 weeks, particularly in severe cases (10). In a meta-analysis and the Euro fetus study, 432 pregnancies were treated by laser treatment in comparison with SA done in 179 pregnancies. The meta-analysis of overall survival rate established that the proportion of survivor fetuses treated with Laser Treatment was twice as great as fetuses treated with SA (66% and 47%, respectively) (11). Neonatal deaths were in those treated by laser and 14-39% in those treated by amnioreduction (12). Untreated TTTS generally carries a poor prognosis, with up to 90% perinatal mortality (14).
 
 
Conclusion

TTTS is a rare and serious complication. It is important to diagnose this syndrome early and intervene in time so that severe complications including perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with this syndrome can be avoided.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Blickstein I. Monochorionicity in perspective. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:235-38.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Gupta P, Arora N, Mital M, Tyagi N. Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome- Ultrasonographic Evaluation-A case report. MAMC J Med Sci.. 2017;3(2):98.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Paek B, Dorn M, Walker M. Atypical twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: prevalence in a population undergoing fetoscopic laser ablation of communicating placental vessels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):115.e1-5.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Simpson, Lynn L. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(1):3-18.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Durbin S. A sonographer’s perspective: quintero staging system for twin- to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2011;27(3):122-25.   [Google Scholar]
6.
Van Mieghem T, Lewi L, Gucciardo L, DeKoninck P, Van Schoubroeck D, Devlieger R, et al. The fetal heart in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;2010: 379792.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Zosmer N, Bajoria R, Weiner E, Rigby M, Vaughan J, Fisk NM. Clinical and echographic features of in utero cardiac dysfunction in the recipient twin in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Br Heart J. 1994;72(1):74-79.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Galea P, Jain V, Fisk NM. Insights into the pathophysiology of twin- twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(9):777-85.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Hoopmann M, Abele H, Wallwiener D. Management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7:329-33.   [Google Scholar]
10.
Obajimi G, Akinmoladun J. Third-trimester ultrasound diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) – A review of two cases. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35(2):199.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Rossi A, D’Addario V. Laser therapy and serial amnioreduction as treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a metaanalysis and review of literature. J Obstetric Gynaecol. 2008;198(2):147-52.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Graef C, Ellenrieder B, Hecher K, Hackeloer B, Huber A, Bartmann P. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of 167 children after intrauterine laser treatment for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):303- 08.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *