Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2022 Month : March-April Volume : 11 Issue : 2 Page : AO15 - AO17 Full Version

Morphometric Analysis of Brachiocephalic Trunk in Brazilian Cadavers of Human Foetuses


José Aderval Aragão, Larissa Emily Ogando de Jesus Sena, José Carlos da Silva Junior, Gabriel Rodrigues de Carvalho Melo, Felipe Matheus Sant’Anna Aragão, Iapunira Catarina S
1. Associate Professor, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, SE, Brazil. 2. Student, Department of Medicine, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, SE, Brazil. 3. Student, Department of Medicine, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, SE, Brazil. 4. Student, Department of Medicine, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, SE, Brazil 5. Student, Department of Medicine, University Centre of Volta Redonda (UNIFOA), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. 6. Student, Department of Medicine, University Centre of Volta Redonda (UNIFOA), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. 7. Adjunct Professor, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, SE, Brazil. 8. Titular Professor, Department of Medicine, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. José Aderval Aragão,
Rua Aloisio Campos 500, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
E-mail: adervalufs@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: The Brachiocephalic Trunk (BCT) is the largest branch of the aortic arch, with an average of 4-5 centimetres length. It usually divides into two vessels, the Right Common Carotid Artery (RCCA) and the Right Subclavian Artery (RSA).

Aim: To conduct a morphometric study of BCT in cadavers of human foetuses and associate it with gender.

Materials and Methods: An observational study was conducted from year 2012 to 2020, in which 35 foetal cadavers (18 male and 17 female) were dissected and fixed in 10% formalin, all belonging to the Human Anatomy Laboratory of the Morphology Department of the Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil. After dissection and exposure of the aortic arch and its branches, measurements were made of the BCT length (from the edge of the aortic arch to its division into the right common carotid and subclavian arteries) and outside diameter (at the origin of the aortic arch) using a 0.05 mm precision digital calliper. The t-Student test was used for independent or unpaired samples to compare the BCT morphometric values in relation to gender, taking p<0.05 as statistically significant. Data were analysed using the Bioestat 5.3.

Results: The length of the BCT varied from 6.19-15.34 mm, with an average of 10.22 mm, and its diameter from 1.51-5.11 mm, with an average of 3.16 mm. The comparative analysis between morphometric measurements and gender did not show any statistically significant difference (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The knowledge of the BCT morphometry in foetuses can assist in the safe execution of various surgical procedures in the mediastinum, as it reduces the chances of serious complications resulting from these procedures.
Keywords : Aortic arch, Biometry, Common carotid artery, Innominate artery
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2022/51945.2758

Date of Submission: Aug 15, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Sep 14, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Oct 12, 2021
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 18, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 08, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 11, 2021 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

The BCT is described as the first and largest branch of the aortic arch, measuring about four to five centimetres in length. After its origin, it ascends to the right of the trachea until, at the level of the right sternocostal joint it forks into two important vessels: the RCCA and the RSA (1).

The BCT, the left subclavian artery and the left common carotid artery arise from the aortic arch (2); this type of branching was initially classified as a normal type A, standard by the anatomist Adachi B in 1928 (3),(4),(5). The type B consists of a common trunk for the left common carotid and the brachiocephalic artery and therefore has only two aortic arch branches, and type C has a vertebral artery originating proximal to the left subclavian artery as a fourth branch of the aortic arch (3),(4),(5). These branches usually originate from the aortic arch or from the upper part of the ascending aorta, but variations in this branching pattern may occur, either in their origin, topography, in the number or in the distances between them (1),(6),(7). In addition, RCCA and LSA may have an origin in the aortic arch of a common trunk; the left BCT (1),(2),(8),(9). This may be missing or doubled (2), as well as the left vertebral artery can arise from the aortic arch, between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery or between the brachycephalic trunk and the left subclavian artery (8),(10). These anatomical variations can alter the cerebral blood flow, leading to neurological lesions or be associated in the genesis of cardiovascular events (11), which could lead to serious complications in clinical practice, in performing interventional surgical procedures (2), in tracheostomy, thyroid and parathyroid gland surgeries (5),(12),(13),(14).

For this reason, the knowledge of these anatomical variations, as well as the analysis of morphometric data of the BCT is an important parameter for the safe performance of surgical procedures, both in cases of tracheostomy and in those of catheterisation in cases of aneurysm and stent implants (13),(15),(16). Thus, recognising the morphological variations, can not only optimise existing anatomical knowledge, but also serve as a basis for several diagnostic methods, as well as in intrathoracic and vascular surgical techniques, in addition to preventing iatrogenesis and complications (2),(13),(17),(18),(19). Thus, the objective of the present study was to conduct a morphometric study of the BCT in cadavers of human foetuses and associate it with gender.
 
 
Material and Methods

An observational study was conducted on 35 foetal cadavers of both sexes (18 male and 17 female), selected for convenience during the period from year 2012 to 2020. Specimens were fixed in 10% formalina and dissected, belonging to the Human Anatomy Laboratory of the Morphology Department of the Federal University of Sergipe Aracaju, SE , Brazil. The present study’s sample was selected in accordance to the Brazilian Federal Law 8.501 (November 30, 1992) and an institutional approval was obtained. The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe, under protocol number 0383.0.107.000-11.

Foetal age was determined by the hallux-calcaneus measurement (20).

Inclusion criteria: All foetuses that were available in the laboratory were included.

Exclusion criteria: Foetuses with cardiovascular malformations were excluded.

Study Procedure

After resection of the anterior chest wall, the adipose tissue was carefully removed, the thymus, the brachiocephalic veins and the pericardium that covered the ascending aorta and the great vessels. The aortic arch was exposed and the BCT was carefully dissected and classified according to Adachi B (3). Its length was measured from the edge of the aortic arch to its division into right common and right subclavian carotid arteries, and its external diameter at its origin with a 0.05 precision digital pachymeter (Table/Fig 1).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The variables were expressed as means and standard deviations. The t-Student test was used for independent or unpaired samples to compare the BCT morphometric values in relation to gender. Values of p>0.05 were considered not statistically significant. Data were analysed using the Bioestat Program 5.3.
 
 
Results

The BCT morphometry was performed on 35 foetuses, being 18 males and 17 females, the majority of the aortic arches found were classified as type A (97.14%), except for one case of type B (2.86%). The age of the foetuses ranged from 18.1-37.8 weeks, with an average of 24.97 weeks. In general, the length of the BCT ranged from 6.19-15.34 mm with an average of 10.22 mm, and its outside diameter from 1.51-5.11 mm with an average of 3.16 mm.

When comparing both the lengths (Table/Fig 2) and the average diameters (Table/Fig 3) of the BCT in relation to sex, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05).
 
 
Discussion

The aortic arch and supra-aortic branches are important anatomical structures for surgeons and interventionists and are responsible for the blood supply of the upper limbs, neck and head (2). Anatomical characteristics of the aortic arch, such as inclination, angulation and distances between the supra-aortic branches, can influence the viability and difficulties of interventional and/or surgical maneuvers.

Thus, knowledge of the distribution, regularity or irregularity and typology of the various anatomical characteristics is essential in the optimisation of all types of diagnostic and/or therapeutic interventions involving the aortic arch (17).

However, several variations have been reported in the literature regarding the number and topography of the branches that originate from the aortic arch (2),(16),(21),(22). The typical pattern (type A) consists of the BCT, left subclavian and left common carotid artery, a pattern found in more than 70% of cases (2),(16),(21),(22). The other patterns are rare and can present from two to seven branches (23),(24),(25),(26). Although it was not the focus of our study, the type A pattern was found in 97.14% of our cases.

The understanding of these variations is extremely important both anatomically and clinically, since they impact on haemodynamic procedures, the aetiology of brain injuries resulting from these vessels, the management of upper chest and neck trauma and also prevent or decrease the occurrence of medical malpractice during surgical procedures (23),(27).

However, in addition to morphological variations, modern surgical and radiological procedures, the recognition of the BCT morphometric data and anatomical vascular variations of the branching pattern of the aortic arch are of great importance in vascular dynamics, as well as in endovascular surgery and in stent implants (17),(28),(29). Thus, in the present study, the morphometric data (length and diameter) of 35 cadavers of human foetuses, with a mean age of 25 weeks, analysed by hallux-calcaneus measurements (20). In general, the average length and diameter of the BCT were 10.22 and 3.16 mm, respectively. However, among male foetuses, the average length and diameter obtained were 10.16 mm and 3.31 mm, while in females, 10.29 mm and 2.99 mm, respectively, showing that there was no statistically significant difference. In general, these results differ from those found by Szpinda M et al., (30). the only morphometric work performed on cadavers of human foetuses, as well as in relation to the various authors, where they performed this morphometry, either through adult cadavers or through radiological images such as angiotomography or computed tomography (Table/Fig 4) (13),(16),(21),(23),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32).

Therefore, these data will serve as an anatomical basis for the insertion of catheters in the main branch of the aortic arch, which certainly helps obtain a better understanding of the morphometric aspects of the BCT, allowing endovascular surgery in foetuses, to be performed with greater safety.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study is the fact that there are a small number of foetuses, as well as the fact we did not group the foetuses by age. Therefore, we suggest that future studies carried out in human foetuses make a division by gestational age groups to obtain more reliable measurements and associations to their respective groups and sexes.
 
 
Conclusion

The morphometric data offered by the present study provides a valuable base about the normal values on foetuses and call attention to the possibility of arterial stenosis or occlusion in cases of obviously reduced dimensions. The morphometric parameters of the BCT taken in foetuses, can help cardiothoracic surgeons in the planning, execution and performance of safer surgeries in the upper mediastinum, as well as in the choice of angiographic catheters, prostheses or stents for the treatment of aneurysms or in vascular or mediastinal lesions in emergency surgery, which provides a valuable basis on normal values on a population basis. The lack of this information can cause serious complications in procedures performed on the mediastinum or base of the neck, while it can also cause brain damage and serious to fatal haemorrhagic incidents.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: JAA; Data acquisition: JAA, LEOJS, JCSJ, GRCM; Data analysis or interpretation: ICSA, FMSA; Drafting of the manuscript: JAA, FPR, DRG; Critical revision of the manuscript: JAA, FPR, LEOJS, JCSJ, GRCM, ICSA, FMSA.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Manyama M, Rambau P, Gilyoma J, Mahalu W. A variant branching pattern of the aortic arch: A case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:29. Doi: 10.1186/1749- 8090-6-29.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-6-29#doi# ?pmid?21396124#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Panagouli E, Tsoucalas G, Papaioannou T, Fiska A, Venieratos D, Skandalakis P. Right and left common carotid arteries arising from the branchiocephalic, a rare variation of the aortic arch. Anat Cell Biol. 2018;51(3):215-17. Doi: 10.5115/ acb.2018.51.3.215.?doi?https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.3.215#doi# ?pmid?30310716#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Adachi B. Das arterian system der Japaner. 1st ed, vol 1, Verlag der KaiserlichJapanischen Universitat, Kenyusha Press, Kyoto 1928;29-41.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Durai Pandian K, Radha K, Sundaravadhanam KVK. Study on branching pattern of arch of aorta in south indian population. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(4):673-76. Doi: 10.16965/ijar.2014.522.?doi?https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2014.522#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
5.
Wang L, Zhang J, Xin S. Morphologic features of the aortic arch and its branches in the adult Chinese population. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(6):1602-08.e1. Doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.092.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.092#doi# ?pmid?27590535#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Iterezote AM, Medeiros AD, Filho RCCB, Petrella S, Junior LCA, Marques SR, et al. Anatomical variation of the brachiocephalic trunk and common carotid artery in neck dissection. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(2):601-03.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022009000200046#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
7.
Shiva Kumar GL, Pamidi N, Somayaji SN, Nayak S, Vollala VR. Anomalous branching pattern of the aortic arch and its clinical applications. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(11):e182-83.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Nayak SR, Pai MM, Prabhu LV, D’Costa S, Shetty P. Anatomical organization of aortic arch Variations in the India: Embryological basis and review. J Vasc Bras. 2006;5(2):95-100.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492006000200004#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
9.
Paraskevas G, Agios P, Stavrakas M, Stoltidou A, Tzaveas A. Left common carotid artery arising from the brachiocephalic trunk: A case report. Cases J. 2008;1(1):83. Doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-83.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-1-83#doi# ?pmid?18694519#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Aragão JA, dos Santos JCC, Cabral DRG, Filho CAO, Barros HP. Anomalous origin of the left vertebral artery in humans: A rare anatomical finding? IJBAS. 2015;4(2):224-27. Doi: 10.14419/ijbas.v4i2.4615.?doi?https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v4i2.4615#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
11.
Yuan SM. Aberrant origin of vertebral artery and its clinical implications. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;31(1):52-59. Doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150071.?doi?https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20150071#doi# ?pmid?27074275#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Mukadam GA, Hoskins E. Aberrant brachio-cephalic artery precluding placement of tracheostomy. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(3):297-98. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2044. 2002.2520_23.x.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2002.2520_23.x#doi# ?pmid?11892648#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Racic G, Matulic J, Roje Z, Dogas Z, Vilovic K. Abnormally high bifurcation of the brachiocephalic trunk as a potential operative hazard: Case report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133(5):811-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.075.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.075#doi# ?pmid?16274818#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Gaikwad MR, Patil KS, Tirpude AP, Wakode NS. Anomalous high transverse course of brachiocephalic trunk and its clinical significance: A rare case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(3):AD03-04. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34387.11278.?doi?https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/34387.11278#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
15.
Huempfner-Hierl H, Hierl T, Halama D. Rare anatomical variation of the brachiocephalic trunk encountered in tracheostomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(3):312-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.012.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.012#doi# ?pmid?27717508#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Panagouli E, Antonopoulos I, Tsoucalas G, Samolis A, Venieratos D, Troupis T. Morphometry of the brachiocephalic artery: A cadaveric anatomical study. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9897. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.9897.?doi?https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9897#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
17.
Demertzis S, Hurni S, Stalder M, Gahl B, Herrmann G, Van den Berg J. Aortic arch morphometry in living humans. J Anat. 2010;217(5):588-96. Doi: 10.1111/ j.1469-7580.2010.01297.x.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01297.x#doi# ?pmid?20979589#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Dave VJ, Upadhya IB. Aberrant innominate artery may complicate a potentially safe surgery. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2015213910. Doi: 10.1136/bcr2015- 213910.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-213910#doi# ?pmid?26795742#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Harky A, Chan JS, Bithas C, Hof A, Sharif M, Froghi S, Bashir M. Innominate vs. axillary artery cannulation in aortic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34(2):213-21. Doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0272.?doi?https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0272#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
20.
Goldstein I, Reece EA, Hobbins JC. Sonographic appearance of the fetal heel ossification centers and foot length measurements provide independent markers for gestational age estimation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(4):923-26. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80172-8.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(88)80172-8#doi# ?pmid?3052082#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Alsaif HA, Ramadan WS. An anatomical study of the aortic arch variations. JKAU: Med Sci. 2010;17(2):37-54. Doi: 10.4197/Med.17-2.4.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4197/Med.17-2.4#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
22.
Tapia-Nañez M, Landeros-Garcia GA, Sada-Treviño MA, Pinales-Razo R, Quiroga- Garza A, Fernandez-Rodarte BA, et al. Morphometry of the aortic arch and its branches. A computed tomography angiography-based study. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2020 Aug 26. Doi: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0098.?doi?https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0098#doi# ?pmid?32844389#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Ortiz NEH, Acuña LEB, Porras PLF. Caracterizacion de las ramas del arco aórtico en una muestra de poblacion Colombiana. Un estudio con material de autopsia. Int J Morphol. 2012;30(1):49-55. Doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022012000100008.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000100008#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
24.
Sunitha V. A study of aortic arch in human fetuses of north Coastal andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences. 2012;2(1):196-200.   [Google Scholar]
25.
Acar M, Ulusoy M, Zararsiz I, Efe D. Anatomical variations in the branching of human aortic arch. Biomedical Research. 2013;24(4):531-35.   [Google Scholar]
26.
Budhiraja V, Rastogi R, Jain V, Bankwar V, Raghuwanshi S. Anatomical variations in the branching pattern of human aortic arch: A cadaveric study from central India. ISRN Anat. 2013;2013:828969. Doi: 10.5402/2013/828969.?doi?https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/828969#doi#?pmid?25938106#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
27.
Tsoucalas G. Anatomy: An essential course for future surgeons. J Univer Surg. 2018;6(1):8. Doi: 10.21767/2254-6758.100098.?doi?https://doi.org/10.21767/2254-6758.100098#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
28.
Kumar R, Kumar I, Singh AK, Kumar P, Sharma PK, Chandra N. Diameters of three major branches of arch of aorta and their correlation with each other, age and gender- A computed tomographic study. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2016;3(4):552-55. Doi: 10.5958/2394-2126.2016.00126.2.?doi?https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-2126.2016.00126.2#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
29.
Aboulhoda BE, Ahmed RK, Awad AS. Clinically-relevant morphometric parameters and anatomical variations of the aortic arch branching pattern. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41(7):731-44. Doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02215-w.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02215-w#doi# ?pmid?30900002#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
30.
Szpinda M, Flisin´ski P, Elminowska-Wenda G, Flisin´ski M, Krakowiak-Sarnowska E. The variability and morphometry of the brachiocephalic trunk in human foetuses. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2005;64(4):309-14.   [Google Scholar]
31.
Honig EI, Steinberg I, Dotter CT. Innominate artery: Angiocardiographic study. Radiology. 1952;58(1):80-88. Doi: 10.1148/58.1.80.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1148/58.1.80#doi# ?pmid?14883376#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
32.
Babu CS, Sharma V. Two common trunks arising from arch of aorta: Case report and literature review of a very rare variation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):AD05- 07. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14219.6253.?doi?https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/14219.6253#doi# ?pmid? 26393115#pmid#  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *