Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2022 Month : March-April Volume : 11 Issue : 2 Page : SO32 - SO36 Full Version

Clinico-histopathological Features of Section Sinonasal Lesions: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Central India


Ved Prakash Narvey, Smriti Saxena, Megha Saluja
1. Professor and Head, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Smriti Saxena,
Junior Resident, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: saxena.smriti04@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Sinonasal Tract (SNT) lesions are frequently observed in the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) practice. These lesions have identical appearance and usually present with nasal obstruction, but have varying differential diagnosis that requires histopathological confirmation. Though a common pathology, studies correlating clinical and histopathological diagnosis of SNT lesions are scarce among patients residing in Central India.

Aim: To assess the prevalence of various lesions in SNT, compare the lesion in relation to age and sex, and simultaneously relate the clinical and histopathological diagnosis.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out, in the Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India, between May 2019 to December 2020. A total of 109 patients with SNT lesions were evaluated and a provisional diagnosis was reached after evaluating the history, and performing the clinical examination. The SNT lesions were excised operatively and definitive diagnosis was reached after histopathologic examination. Finally, clinical diagnosis was related with histopathologic diagnosis and percentage of patients in which clinical diagnosis similar to the histopathological diagnosis was calculated.

Results: A total of 109 patients with SNT lesions were evaluated and the most common age groups to be affected were 21-30 and 31-40 years (22.9% each). Majority of the patients were males (53.2%) and had the complaints for the last three months to a year (63.3%). The most common complaint was nasal obstruction (93.6%) followed by rhinorrhoea (71.6%). Most common types of lesions were non neoplastic (77.1%). Among the neoplastic lesion, majority were benign (70.8%). Among various lesions, inflammatory nasal polyp (78.8%), haemangioma (47.1%), and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) (57.1%) were the
most commonly observed non neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions, respectively. The concordance between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was 88.1%, as 96 patients out of 109 clinically diagnosed patients, were confirmed on histopathology.

Conclusion: The SNTs lesions are complex and their nature varies widely. The histopathological examination is essential to confirm the diagnosis and manage the patients, especially in patients with malignant lesions.
Keywords : Excised, Nasal cavity, Nasal obstruction, Neoplastic lesions, Polyps
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2022/52897.2786

Date of Submission: Oct 16, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 16, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jan 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval Obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 19, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jan 01, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 26, 2022 (8%)

Etymology: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses together constitute the SNT (1). This tract is affected by a wide array of both non neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, which are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Among these lesions, Sinonasal Masses (SNMs) are one of the commonest presenting complaints in the ENT Outpatient Department and have a prevalence of 1-4% (2). The SNMs can be congenital, inflammatory, traumatic, or neoplastic (benign or malignant) in origin and thus, have a variety of differential diagnoses. Among SNMs, nasal polyps are frequently reported with a prevalence of 2% (3). The polypoidal SNMs result in various symptoms including obstruction, epistaxis, blood-stained nasal discharge, rhinorrhoea, and rarely facial pain and deformity (4).

Tumours in the SNTs are infrequently reported and constitute around 3% of all malignancies involving the head and neck region and also around 1% of the tumour affecting the human body (5). These tumours usually present with features that are occasionally non specific and can imitate those of inflammatory SNT diseases such as nasal obstruction and discharge (6). On the basis of histopathology, tumours can be either benign or malignant. The commonly observed benign tumours are haemangioma and inverted papilloma; while, the frequently observed malignant tumour is SCC which comprises 80% of the malignant tumours involving the SNT (7).

To arrive at a differential diagnosis, a complete clinical evaluation comprising of detailed history, radiological imaging, and endoscopic evaluation are required. However, to reach a definitive diagnosis,
histopathological examination is necessary (8). Thus, a combination of clinical and histopathological examination results in opportune diagnosis and management (9). Hence, the objective of the present
study was to assess the prevalence of various lesions in SNT, compare the lesion in relation to age and sex, and simultaneously, relate the clinical and histopathological diagnosis.
 
 
Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study carried out, between May 2019 and December 2020, in the Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Gajraraja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India. Prior to the beginning of the study, the protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (62/IEC/GRMC/2019) and written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Inclusion criteria: All patients with the lesions in the SNT or symptoms of nasal blockage, epistaxis, or rhinorrhoea were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients not willing to undergo surgery or biopsy, previously treated for the lesions in SNT with recurrence, or specimens poorly preserved in formalin were excluded.

Study Procedure

A total of 109 postoperative specimens fixed in formalin, accompanied by detailed history, and findings of clinical and radiological examinations were obtained from the ENT Department. Following which, specimens were grossly examined and all the available findings (i.e., history, clinical, laboratory, radiological, and gross examination) were recorded in a specifically designed case report form. Adequate sections were obtained from the specimens and then the sections were subjected to Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stains. Moreover, immunohistochemical and special stains were used to finalise the diagnosis, wherever required. Finally, histopathological findings were recorded in the case report form.

Other data pertaining to age, sex, presenting complaints, duration of complaints, general examination, local examination of site, and other characteristics of lesions in SNT were recorded. For the presentation of the results, the lesions in SNT were divided into neoplastic and non neoplastic. The neoplastic lesions were further divided into benign and malignant.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The present study was descriptive in nature and non parametric data was represented in terms of frequencies (N) and percentages (%).
 
 
Results

Majority of the patients were males (58, 53.2%) and had the presenting complaints for the last three months to a year (69, 63.3%). Most common types of lesions affecting the SNT were non neoplastic (85,78.0%), involved the nasal cavity (86, 78.9%), and aroused from the right side of the nasal cavity (40, 36.6%). Among the neoplastic lesion (24, 22.01%), majority were benign (17, 70.8%) (Table/Fig 1).

The most and least common age groups to be affected were 21-30 and 31-40 years (both 25, 22.9%), and 0-10 years (2, 1.8%), respectively. The youngest and oldest patients were a six-year-old girl and a 76-year-old woman, respectively. The most common complaint was nasal obstruction (102, 93.6%) followed by rhinorrhoea (78, 71.6%), while the least common complaint was facial swelling (29, 26.6%). Both males (47, 43.1%) and females (38,34.9%) were frequently affected by non neoplastic lesion of the SNT (Table/Fig 2). Among the lesions involving the SNT, inflammatory nasal polyp (67, 61.5%), haemangioma (8, 7.3%), and SCC (4,
3.7%) were the most commonly observed non neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions, respectively (Table/Fig 3).

On the basis of the age groups affected, the non neoplastic lesions were most commonly observed in 31-40 years age group (23,21.1%) followed by 21-30 years age group (21, 19.27%). Following the similar trend, inflammatory nasal polyps were frequently observed in 31-40 years (22, 25.9%) followed by 21-30 years (15, 17.6%) age group. Allergic polyps were frequently observed in 41-50 years age group (3, 3.5%). While, rhinosporidiosis was frequently observed 61-70 years age group (3, 3.5% each). Moreover, fungal infections were observed in 11-30 years age group. Majority of the benign and malignant neoplasms were reported after fourth and fifth decade, respectively. Haemangioma was observed equally in 11-20, 21-30,and 41-50 years age group (2, 11.8% each). However, the SCC (SCC) was the most commonly observed in 51-60 years age group (3, 42.9%) (Table/Fig 4).

On the basis of the sex affected, the non neoplastic lesions were most commonly observed in males (47, 55.3%). Following the similar trend, inflammatory nasal polyps were frequently observed in males (40, 47.1%). However, allergic polyps (6, 7.1%) and rhinosporidiosis (2, 2.3%) were frequently observed in females. The benign neoplastic lesions revealed a female predominance (9,52.9%). However, haemangioma was equally observed in males and females (4, 23.5% each). In contrast to benign lesions, malignant lesions revealed a male predominance (5, 71.4%). Similarly, SCC was predominantly observed in males (3, 42.8%) (Table/Fig 5).

Clinical and histopathological concordance revealed that among non neoplastic lesions, of 82 (85.42%), 5 (5.21%), 5 (5.21%), and 4 (4.16%) clinically diagnosed patients of inflammatory polyps, fungating mass, rhinosporidiosis, and inverted papilloma, 74 (90.2%), 3 (60%), 4 (80%), and 3 (75%), respectively, were confirmed on histopathology. Among benign lesions, all the eight patients were clinically diagnosed as haemangioma were confirmed on histopathology. Similarly, among malignant lesions, all the four patients clinically diagnosed as malignancy were confirmed on histopathology. Finally, out of 109 clinically diagnosed patients, 96 were confirmed on histopathology. Thus, the clinico-histopathological concordance was 88.1% (Table/Fig 6).

Photomicrograph of non neoplastic, benign, and malignant SNT lesions are illustrated in [Table/Fig-(7),(8),(9).

 
 
Discussion

In the present study, majority of the SNT lesions were non neoplastic (77.9%). Other studies evaluating the clinicopathological profile of SNMs reported similar findings (10),(11),-12]. However, another study reported almost equal prevalence of non neoplastic and neoplastic lesions (13). This could be due to the nearly equal presence of younger patients with non neoplastic and older patients with neoplastic lesions.

The most susceptible period of life for the growth of SNMs is between 2nd and 4th. Moreover, period after 4th decade of life is usually associated with increase in prevalence of malignancies. Similarly, in the present study, the patients presenting with the SNT lesion belonged to a wide range of age i.e., from 6 to 76 years and the peak prevalence was observed in 31-40 years age groups (22.9%). Other studies have reported similar findings (14). However, according to another study, peak prevalence of SNT lesions was reported equally in 11-20 and 31-40 years age groups (10). On analysing the lesions according to their type, peak prevalence of non neoplastic lesions was observed between 21 and 40 years of age. However, benign lesions were more prevalent between 41 and 60 years of age, and malignant lesions were more prevalent after 30 years of age. These findings are supported by other studies (10),(11).

The distribution of SNT lesions by sex revealed that males are commonly predisposed (53.2%) and male to female ratio was 1.1:1. Various studies have also reported male preponderance (8),(10),(15),(16). This could be due higher prevalence of SNT lesions in males.

The distribution of SNT lesions by location revealed that nasal cavity was most commonly involved (78.9%), which was similar to the findings of other studies (8),(17). This could be due to relatively higher exposure of nasal cavity to external agents than the paranasal sinuses. Moreover, the maximum number of patients (69.7%) had unilateral SNT lesions. Similar finding are reported by other studies (4),(1)5,(16).

The maximum number of patients presented within 3 months to 1 year of symptom onset (63.3%), and this was comparable to the findings of Bist SS et al., (18). However, another study observed that maximum number of patients presented between six months to two years (15). This could be due to relatively slower growth rate of SNMs and general tendency of patients to delay the hospital visit till the symptoms become unbearable.

Nasal obstruction (93.6%) followed by rhinorrhoea (71.6%), and facial swelling (26.6%) were the most common, and least common presenting complaints and this was consistent with the findings of other studies (10),(11),(16). The most common lesion involving the SNT was the simple nasal polyp (68.8%). Similarly, the simple nasal polyps were the most common non neoplastic lesions (88.2%). These findings were supported by various studies (16),(19),(20),(21),(22). Haemangioma (47.1%) was the most common benign lesions, and was comparable to other studies (10),(16). Similarly, SCC (57.1%) was the most common malignant lesions. However, the prevalence of the malignant lesions, in the presents study, was less than that observed by others (10),(12),(16). This could be due to differences in the genetic make-up of the patients studied.

The maximum number of non neoplastic lesions were observed in the 2nd and 3rd decade. Similar prevalence of non neoplastic lesions was reported by other researchers (8),(10),(11),(12). However, for benign lesions, majority of the patients were in the 5th and 6th decade and these findings are supported by other researchers (10),(20),(23). Moreover, the peak prevalence of haemangioma was in the second, third, and fifth decade, which was comparable to the findings of Garg D and Mathur K (12). The prevalence of schwannoma, pleomorphic adenoma, fibroma, neurofibroma, and angiofibroma was less and consisted of one case each. The rare occurrence of these benign lesions is supported by other researchers (12),(19). For malignant lesions, the incidence began in the 4th decade and the highest prevalence was observed in between 6th and 8th decade and these findings are supported by other studies (4),(10),(16),(20). All four patients with SCC were observed after the 4th decade. Similar findings were reported by others (10),(12),(24). There was a patient of primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET) that was CD99(+), and vimentin (+) on immunohistochemistry. Similarly, Garg D and Mathur K reported a case of PNET, suggestive of its rarity (12). Olfactory neuroblastoma is a rare tumour arising from olfactory sensory epithelium in the upper part of nose. There was a single case of olfactory neuroblastoma (14.3%) and the findings are in concordance with Parajuli S and Tuladhar A (20). Thus, the findings of the present study are supported by the literature that non neoplastic SNT lesions are highly prevalent in the young age group, while neoplastic SNT lesions are highly prevalent in the middle and elderly age group.

The non neoplastic lesions had higher prevalence in males (54.1%). Similarly, other studies have also reported male preponderance (4),(10),(21). Contrarily, Parajuli S and Tuladhar A reported the female preponderance (20). The prevalence of benign lesions was higher in females (52.9%). This finding was comparable with the findings of others (20). However, other studies have reported a higher prevalence in males (4),(10),(21). In the present study, haemangioma was equally prevalent in both the sexes. However, Ghanghurde and Dhawle M reported a higher prevalence of haemangioma in males (19). Moreover, similar to the findings of the present study, Ghanghurde and Dhawle M reported one case of pleomorphic adenoma in a female (19). Similar to the non neoplastic and benign lesions, the prevalence of malignant lesions was higher in males (66.67%) and this was consistent with the findings of other researchers (4),(10),(11),(20). However, Mane P and Agale S reported a higher prevalence among females (21). Similarly, SCC was prevalent in males. However, Ghanghurde S and Dhawle M reported higher prevalence in females (19). Thus, the findings of the present study are supported by the literature that males have higher prevalence of both neoplastic and non neoplastic SNT lesions.

The relation between clinical and histopathological diagnosis of SNT lesions was 88.1% i.e. out of 109 clinically diagnosed patients, 96 were confirmed on histopathology. Similarly, Sharma R et al., reported 84% correlation in clinical and histopathological diagnosis (15). However, other studies have reported more than 95% correlation (3),(18). In another study by Kale SU et al., 99.7% correlation was achieved in the diagnosis of nasal polyps (25).

Limitation(s)

The study is limited by its small sample size.
 
 
Conclusion

From the present study, it is evident that lesions of SNTs are complex and their nature varies widely. These lesions were predominantly seen in males and commonly affected individuals in the age group of 31-40 years. Inflammatory nasal polyps were the most common non neoplastic condition. While, haemangioma and SCC were the commonest benign and malignant neoplasms, respectively. The overall clinical and histopathological concordance achieved was 88.1%. Thus, histopathological examination is essential to correctly diagnose remaining 11.9% patients.
 
 
Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Vikas S. Sharma (MD), Principal Consultant, Maverick Medicorum TM (India), for medical writing assistance in the preparation of this article.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Bhattacharyya R, Chakrabarti I, Giri I, Banerjee A, Bhattacharya J, Goswami B. A clinicopathological study of masses arising from sinonasal tract and nasopharynx in north Bengal population with special reference to neoplasms. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2015;31(2):98.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.156091#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
2.
Kirtsreesakul V. Update on Nasal Polyps: Etiopathogenesis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(12):1966-72.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Gupta R, Moupachi SS, Poorey VK. Sinonasal Masses: A Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(1):52-56.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0602-x#doi# ?pmid?24381921#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Sutar HB. Clinicopathological Study of Nasal Polypoidal Masses. Annals of Int. Medical and Dental Research. 2015;1(3):315-19.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Alabi BS, Afolabi OA, Omokanye HK, Dunmade AD, Ayodele SO. Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Sinonasal Tumours in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital6-year Review. Niger Med J. 2017;58(3):92-95.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_265_14#doi# ?pmid?29962649#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Weber AL. Tumours of the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988;21:439-54. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)31514-0#doi# ?pmid?3041350#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Lango MN, Topham NS, Perlis CS, Flieder DB, Weaver MW, Turaka A, et al. Surgery in the Multimodality Treatment of Sinonasal Malignancies. 2010;34(5):304-21. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2010.07.001#doi# ?pmid?20851263#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Zafar U, Khan N, Afroz N, Hasan S. Clinicopathological study of non neoplastic lesions of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51(1):26-29. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.40386#doi# ?pmid?18417845#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Kulkarni A, Mudholkar V, Acharya A, Ramteke R. Histopathological Study of Lesions of Nose and Paranasal Sinuses. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(3):275-79. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0286-7#doi# ?pmid?23998035#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Lathi A, Syed MMA, Kalakoti P, Qutub D. Clinicopathological Profile of Sinonasal Masses: A study from a tertiary care hospital of India. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31(6):372-77.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Humayun AHP, Zahurul Huq AHM, Ahmed SMT, Kamal MS, Kyaw Khin U, Bhattacharjee N. Clinicopathological study of sinonasal masses. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;16(1):15-22. Doi: 10.3329/bjo.v16i1.5776.?doi?https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v16i1.5776#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
12.
Garg D, Mathur K. Clinicopathological Study of Space Occupying Lesions of Nassal Cavity, Paranasal sinuses and Nasopharynx. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(11):FC04-07. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/10662.5150#doi# ?pmid?25584226#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Dasgupta A, Ghosh RN, Mukherjee C. Nasal polyps- Histopathologic spectrum. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;49(1):32-36. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991708#doi# ?pmid?23119246#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Nayak M, Raul B, Agrawal K, Nayak S. Clinicopathological study of lesions of sinonasal tract and distribution of sinonasal tract lesions in different age groups and sex. Int J of Adv Research. 2015;3(4):726-33.   [Google Scholar]
15.
Sharma R, Sahni D, Uppal K, Gupta R, Singla G. A clinicopathological study of masses of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Haed and Neck Surgery. 2017;3(2):253-58.?doi?https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20170946#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
16.
Maheshwari A, Bansal A. Clinicopathological spectrum of sinonasal masses: A tertiary care hospital experience. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;3(4):1015-19.?doi?https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20174324#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
17.
Shah S, Goswami Y. Study of Lesions of Nasal Cavity, Nasopharynx and Paranasal Sinuses by Histopathological Examination Gujarat Medical Journal. 2012;67(2):70-72.   [Google Scholar]
18.
Bist SS, Varshney S, Baunthiyal V, Bhagat S, Kusum A. Clinico-pathological profile of sinonasal masses: An experience in tertiary care hospital of Uttarakhand. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3(2):180-86.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.111375#doi# ?pmid?23833494#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Ghanghurde S, Dhawle M. Clinicopathological Study of Tumour and Tumour like Lesions of nose and paranasal sinuses International Journal of Science and Research. 2018;7(4):378-81.   [Google Scholar]
20.
Parajuli S, Tuladhar A. Histomorphological spectrum of masses of the masses of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2013;3(5):351-55.?doi?https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v3i5.7857#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
21.
Mane P, Agale S. Clinicopathological Study of Sinonasal Masses. Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2017;4(3):A261-67.?doi?https://doi.org/10.21276/APALM.1207#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
22.
Chandra C, Gupta P. A histopathological study of lesions of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. International Journal of Medical and Health Research. 2017;3(7):09-11.   [Google Scholar]
23.
Swamy KV, Chandre Gowda BV. A Clinical Study of Benign Tumours of Nose and Paranasal Sinuses. Indian Journal of Otolryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2004;56(4):265-68.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02974384#doi# ?pmid?23120093#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Swami SV, Birare SD, Dalve KT, Korade ST. Clinicopathological study of non neoplastic and neoplastic sinonasal lesions. Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology. 2017;2(2):40-43.   [Google Scholar]
25.
Kale SU, Mohite U, Rowlans D, Drake-Lee AB. Clinical and histopathological correlation of nasal polyps: Are there any surprises? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26(4):321-23.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00482.x#doi# ?pmid?11559346#pmid#  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *