Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Publisher
Contact Us
Current Issue
Online Ahead of Print
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here
Register For Article Submission
Login Here
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year : 2017 Month : July-September Volume : 6 Issue : 3 Page : AO05 - AO09

A Study on Morphometry and Morphological Variation of Suprascapular Notch in Dried Human Scapula


Sudarshan Gupta, Zarna Pa tel, Deepak Howale
1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, GMERS, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, GMERS, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, GMERS, Valsad, Gujarat, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sudarshan Gupta,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy,
GEMRS Medical College,
Gandhinagar-382012, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: drsudarshangupta@yahoo.com
zdpdoctor@yahoo.com
 
ABSTRACT

: The Suprascapular Notch (SSN) is located
at the superior border of the scapula, just medial to the
base of the coracoid process. The knowledge of variations
in shapes and dimensions can be helpful to clinicians
to correlate the suprascapular nerve entrapment with a
specific type of notch.

Aim: This study was carried out to observe morphological
variation in shapes of SSN and morphometric analysis of
SSN.

Materials and Methods: A total of 120 adult scapulae of
unknown age and sex will be obtained from Department
of Anatomy, GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar and
Sola, Gujarat, India. The shapes of SSN were observed
and dimensions were taken by digital Vernier caliper.

Results: The most common type of SSN observed was
Type 2, a notch that was longest in its transverse diameter.
The least common type was Type 4. Type 5 SSN was absent.
The most common shape was ‘J’ and least common was
‘V’.Partial and complete ossification was also noted.

Conclusion: Knowledge of anatomical variations of
suprascapular notch is better for understanding location
and source of entrapment syndrome. Since, the present
study is performed with a limited number of dry scapulae,
so there is need of further clinical, radiological and
cadaveric studies.
Keywords : Ossified suprascapular ligament, Rotator cuff, Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome
 
INTRODUCTION

The scapula in humans is located between second to seventh ribs in the post lateral part of the chest. It is a flat bone which is triangular in shape. At the superior border of scapula, a notch is present medially to coracoid process base. This notch is called the SSN. Suprascapular nerve passes through SSN which is motor nerve to supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles,and sensory to rotator cuff muscles, ligamentous structures of shoulder andacromio-clavicular joint (1). The suprascapular nerve passes through the suprascapular foramen which is created by the attachment of superior transverse scapular ligament to the notch (2).

Kopell and Thompson were the first to describe suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome at SSN (3). Over the years, many studies have investigated anatomical variations in the SSN and found out that ossified suprascapular ligament is one of the possible cause for development of suprascapular neuropathy (4). It is characterised by shoulder pain, weakness in arm, difficulty in external rotation and abduction, and atrophy of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles.This syndrome is commonly seen in those who are involved in overhead heavy work, athletes such as baseball players, volleyball players, weight lifters etc., (4). The SSN was classified into six types by Rengachary et al., (5),(6),(7), based on the shape of notch.

This study has been planned with the following objectives:

1) To find out the prevalence of the various shapes of SSN.

2) Morphometric analysis of different shape of SSN and to find out the any difference in measurements of different shape and on right and left side scapulae.
 
MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an observational analytical type of study to determine the morphological variations and morphometric analysis of SSN in dried human scapulae conducted at Department of Anatomy of GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India during September 2016 to December 2016 (4 Months).

Using Epi Info 7 by CDC Atlanta (8), and considering a prevalence rate of variation in shape of SSN as 26.9% from previous studies (9), confidence level as 95%, acceptable margin of error as 8% and design effect of 1, the provisional sample size was calculated to be 120. These 120 human dried scapula of unknown age and sex were obtained from Department of Anatomy, GMERS Medical College of Gandhinagar and GMERS Medical College Sola (Ahmedabad) after obtaining proper administrative and ethical clearance.

Only bones that were intact and free from any pathological or congenital anomalies were used.

The shape of SSN was observed on gross examination. According to the shape, the notch was classified as ‘J’, ‘U’, ‘V’ having indentation or notch completely absent. Partial/ complete ossification of suprascapular ligament was also taken into account.

Anatomic measurements accurate to 0.1 mm were measured by a digital Vernier caliper. Vertical Length (VL), Transverse Diameter (TD) and distance from the base of SSN to the superior rim of glenoid cavity were measured (Table/Fig 1). VL was the length between the midpoint of imaginary line joining the superior corners of the notch and maximal depth of the notch. The line perpendicular to the midpoint of VL was take as the TD.

Nasis K et al., classified the SSN into five different types (3):

1) Type 1: Without any discrete notch,

2) Type 2: The notch that had longest transverse diameter,

3) Type 3: The notch that had longest vertical length,

4) Type 4: With a bony foramen, and

5) Type 5: With a notch and a bony formen. Photographs of different types of SSNes were also taken for record keeping purpose.
 
RESULTS

(Table/Fig 2) shows the classification of SSN according to Natsis K et al., (3). In this study, the most common type of SSN was Type 2 (66%), followed by Type 3 (18%) and Type 1 (13%). Least common type of SSN was Type 4 (3%). Type 5 SSN i.e., notch with bony foramen was not observed in any scapula.

Classification of SSN according to its shape is shown in (Table/Fig 3). The most common type was ‘J’ (44%), followed by ‘U’ (22%), and ‘V’ (7%). Notch with indentation was found in 11%, whereas notch was completely absent in 8% of the scapula. Partial ossification was observed in 5% while complete ossification was observed in 3% of the scapula (Table/Fig 4).

(Table/Fig 5) shows the morphometric analysis of the SSN. The mean and standard deviation of vertical length, transverse diameter and distance from base of SSN to supraglenoid tubercle are noted. The mean of vertical length and transverse diameter of left scapula is significantly more than that of right scapula.

Morphometric measurements (vertical length, transverse diameter and distance from base of SN to supraglenoid tubercle) in ‘U’, ‘V’ and ‘J’ shaped scapula are shown in (Table/Fig 6). The mean vertical length was significantly higher in ‘U’ shape and lower in ‘J’ shape. Similarly, mean transverse diameter was significantly higher in ‘U’ shape than ‘V’ shape. Post-hoc-test determined significant difference in mean vertical length between all three shapes. However, there was no significant difference in mean transverse diameter between ‘V’ and ‘J’ shaped scapula.

(Table/Fig 7) shows the shape-wise morphometric differences in right and left scapula. Mean vertical length was significantly higher in left ‘U’, ‘V’ and ‘J’ shaped scapula. All three shapes of left sided scapula also had significantly higher transverse diameter.
 
DISCUSSION

In this study, according to Natsis K et al., classification (3), we observed four different types of SSN with varying percentages. Type 5 notch was not observed. Hardlicka, 1942 (4) was first to separate the SSNes into five types. Rengachary et al., (5),(6),(7) classified the SN into six types. Type 6 is complete ossification of ligament resulting in a bony foramen of variable size. This classification was modified by Ticker JB et al., (10) and Bayramoglu A et al., (11) and included the ‘U’, ‘V’ shape and notch with ossification.

Polguj M et al., (12) elaborated a different classification in which three distances were measured: the maximal depth, superior and middle transverse diameter. The prevalence of completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament was 10% as found in a study by Kannan U et al., (14). Chabra N et al., (14) in their study did not found any Type 5 notch whereas, Type 2 was most common. Similar observations were found in present study. Wang HJ et al., (15) found proportion of completely ossified suprascapular ligament was 2.4%. Iqubal K et al., (16) reported ‘J’ shaped notch as the most common type (22%). Agrawal D et al., Patel P et al., and Sutaria L et al., found ‘U’ shaped notch at respectively 45%, 47.5%, 38% (17),(18),(19).

(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9) shows comparison of morphological variations in SN in present study viz-a-viz other previous studies. However, the present study takes a step further in comparing morphometry of scapula with various shapes, and their differences in left and right scapula.

Shape of bone is determined by morphogenetic factors and effect of strain also plays a major role in it. When mechanical or gravitational stresses are reduced or bone subjected to constant pressure, bone resorption occurs. On the other hand constant tension favours bone deposition. If force is applied to skeletal tissues they are able to adapt to their mechanical properties to match with the applied force. In case of increased strain, cells detect it and respond by deposition of more extracellular matrix by which stiffness of the tissue increases and strain level returns to normal. In similar way reduced strain leads to decrease production of extracellular matrix, decrease stiffness, so strain increases to normal level (23).

Scapula develops from a cartilaginous model. It ossified from eight or more ossification centers: one in the body, two in the coracoid process, two in the acromion, one each in the medial border, inferior angle and lower part of the rim of the glenoid cavity. The centre for the body appears in the eighth intrauterine week. In most persons, ossification starts in the coracoid process in the first year of life. The coracoid process joins the rest of the scapula at about the 15th year. At or after puberty, ossification also occurs in sub coracoid part, lower part of glenoid cavity, in the acromion process and medial border. The upper third of glenoid cavity is ossified from sub coracoid centre. In males this unites with rest of scapula at 17th year and in females at 14th year. By 20th year, the various epiphyses have all joined the scapula (23).

Scapula is a flat bone. Near it superior border it provide attachment to levator scapulae, supraspinatus, inferior belly of omohyoid and subscapularis muscle. Scapular attachment of levator scapulae on medial border extend from superior angle to medial end of scapular spine. Subscapularis arises from medial two third of the costal surface of the scapula. Supraspinatus arise from medial two third of supraspinous fossa and the supraspinous fascia. Inferior belly of omohyoid attached near the SSN and occasionally from the superior transverse scapular ligament. The hyoid bone is depressed by the inferior belly of omohyoid. This muscle is contracted in prolonged inspiratory effort which creates tension in lower part of deep cervical fascia and reduces the tendency of the soft part to be sucked inward (23).

Scapula provides attachment of various muscles that act on the shoulder girdle and shoulder joint. Traction and forced applied by these muscle near the superior border may modify the shape of SSN. That lies near the junction of subcoracoid epiphysis and body of the scapula and this area completely ossified in 14th year in the female and the 17th year in the male (23).
 
CONCLUSION

Knowledge about anatomical variations of SSN is helpful for considering the location and source of entrapment syndrome. Variation in morphometry in left and right sided scapula as well as in different shapes of scapula could be expected. As scapula is a flat bone and various muscles are attached to it, traction force applied by these muscles during movement of shoulder girdle and shoulder joint may lead to some variation in the morphology of scapula.The knowledge of this variations would be helpful during surgical and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. The sample size of human scapula was relatively limited in the present study, so there is scope for further studies focusing on clinical and radiological correlations.
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We sincerely thank the Heads of Department of Anatomy of GMERS Medical College, Sola and Gandhinagar for granting permission to carry out this study.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Kopell HP, Thompson WA. Pain and the frozen shoulder. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1959;109(1):92-96.
2.
Rengachary SS, Neff JP, Singer PA, Brackett CE. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study: part 1: clinical study. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(4):441-46.
3.
Natsis K, Totlis T, Tsikaras P, Appell HJ, Skandalakis P, Koebke J. Proposal for classification of the SSN: A study on 423 dried scapulas. Clinical Anatomy. 2007;20:135-39.
4.
Hardlika A. The scapula-visual observations. Am J Phys Antropol. 1942;29:73-94.
5.
Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Hassanein KM, Mohn MP, Matzke H. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 1: Clinical study. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(4):441-46.
6.
Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Hassanein KM, Mohn MP, Matzke H. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative. Study Part 2: anatomical study. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(4):447-51.
7.
Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Brackett CE. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: A clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 3. Neurosurgery.1979;5(4):452-55.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epi Info version 3.5.1, 2008. Available from: www.cdc.gov/epiinfo
9.
Sangam MR, Sarada Devi SS, Krupadanam K, Anasuya K. A study on the morphology of the suprascapular notch and its distance from the glenoid cavity. J Clinic Diagn Res. 2013;7(2):189-92.
10.
Ticker JB, Djurasovic M, Strauch RJ, April EW, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, et al. The incidence of ganglion cysts and other variations in anatomy along the course of the suprascapular nerve. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 1998;7(5):472-78.
11.
Bayramoglu A, Demiryürek D, Tüccar E, Erbil M, Aldur MM, Tetik O, et al. Variations in anatomy at the suprascapular notch possibly causing suprascapular nerve entrapment: an anatomical study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2003;11(6):393- 98.
12.
Polguj M, Jedrzejeski KS, Podgorski M, Topol M. Correlation between morphometry of suprascapular notch and anthropometric measurements of the scapula. Folia Morphol. 2011;70:109-15.
13.
Kannan U, Kannan NS, Anbalagan J, Rao S. Morphological study of suprascapular notch in Indian dry scapulae with specific reference to the incidence of completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):07- 10.
14.
Chhabra N, Prakash S, Ahuja MS. Morphometry and morphology of supra scapular notch: its importance in suprascapular nerve entrapment. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4(3):2536-41.
15.
Wang HJ, Chen C, Wu LP, Pan CQ, Zhang WJ, Li YK. Variable morphology of the suprascapular notch: an investigation and quantitative measurements in Chinese population. Clinical Anatomy. 2011;24(1):47-55.
16.
Iqbal K, Iqubal R. Anatomical variations of suprascapular notch inscapula. J Morphol Sci. 2010:27(1):01-02.
17.
Agrawal D, Singh B, Agrawal GA. Human scapulae; Suprascapular notch, morphometry and variations. Indian Jour Clin Anat & Physio. 2014;1(1):01-07.
18.
Patel P, Patel SV, Patel SM, Badal J, Chavda S, Patel D. Study of variations in the shape of the suprascapular notch in Dried Human Scapula. Int J Biol Med Res. 2013;4(2):3162–64.
19.
Sutaria LK. Morphology and morphometric analysis of suprascapular notch. IJBAR. 2013;4(1):35-39.
20.
Kumar A, Sharma A, Singh P. Anatomical study of the suprascapular notch: quantitative analysis and clinical considerations for suprascapular nerve entrapment. Singapore Medical Journal. 2014;55(1):41.
21.
Soni G, Malik VS, Boddeti RK. Morphometric analysis of suprascapular notch: review of literature. Int J Anat Res. 2015;3(4):1624-28.
22.
Vasudha TK, Shetty A, Gowd S, Rajasekhar SS. Morphological study on suprascapular notch and superior transverse scapular ligaments in human scapulae. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2013;2(4):793-98.
23.
Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th Edition. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table / Fig - 1]  [Table / Fig - 2]  [Table / Fig - 3]  [Table / Fig - 4]  [Table / Fig - 5]  [Table / Fig - 6]  [Table / Fig - 7]  [Table / Fig - 8]  [Table / Fig - 9]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
© 2025 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *