Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2018 Month : March-April Volume : 7 Issue : 2 Page : RO30 - RO37

Combined Evaluation of Breast Carcinoma with Digital Mammography and Sonomammography-A Prospective Study

Correspondence Address :
Kamini Gupta, Srishti Arora, Parambir Sandhu,
Dr. Kamini Gupta,
C/o Profile Cosmetic Clinic, 47-B, Tagore Nagar,
Ludhiana-1410011, Punjab, India.
E-mail: kaminikshitij@gmail.com
Introduction: Introduction: The incidence of breast cancer is rising in developing countries with an annual increase of 3.1% in India. Early diagnosis, work up and intervention is saving many lives.

Aim: To study and compare the mammographic and sonomammographic characteristics of breast carcinoma.Also, to evaluate the additional benefit of combining ultrasound with mammography by categorising them on the BIRADS system.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted over a period of one and a half year with a study population of 30 patients in the Radiodiagnosis Department of Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India. All the cases underwent X-ray mammography and ultrasound (using high frequency linear probe, 5-12MHz). Elastography was also done in all patients. All malignant breast lesions were characterised on both modalities and comparison of characteristics was done. BIRADS score was given on each modality separately as well as by combining the findings of both modalities in all the patients.

Results: Our results show that findings of mammography and sonomammography correlated well. Mammography was better in detecting architectural distortion and microcalcifications while sonomammography provided additional benefit by determining exact mass size, duct dilatation and hardness of malignant mass. When the results of both modalities were interpreted together, it was found to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: We concluded that mammography and ultrasound are complementary to each other in malignant breast lesions and increase the confidence of diagnosis. Every radiologist should give a combined BIRADS score to grade breast masses irrespective of the age of patient and density of breast tissue, so as to avoid delay in diagnosis and treatment.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *