Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2019 Month : March-April Volume : 8 Issue : 2 Page : RO15 - RO21

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Diagnosing Brain Tumours? Is it Worth Doing

Correspondence Address :
Sunita Dashottar, Rushabh Bhikhabhai Suthar,
Dr. Rushabh Bhikhabhai Suthar,
Junior resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Command Hospital, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sunitadashottar70@gmail.com; rushabhb84@gmail.com
Introduction: Introduction: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive diagnostic method useful in providing information about specific metabolites in brain tissue that can indicate the presence of tumour, necrotic tissue and other pathologic entities.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRS in detecting, differentiating and grading brain tumours and to determine the diagnostic value of MRS.

Materials and Methods: Prospective study was performed on 31 patients falling in the sampling frame. Patients were subjected to conventional MRI followed by MR Spectroscopy using 1.5 Tesla machine. Findings of conventional MRI brain and MRS were compared and correlated with the histopathological data in every case. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21. The data represented as number, percentage and mean± SD. Independent sample t-test was used to analyse the data. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The study demonstrated correlation agreement of 83.87% (in diagnosing brain tumours) between conventional MRI and histopathological diagnosis while correlation agreement of 90.3% between MRI combined with MRS diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis. Mean Cho/Crand Cho/NAA levels showed a significant association with histopathological diagnosis with p-value <0.001 for Cho/Cr Ratio and p-value = 0.002.

Conclusion: MRS is a useful aid to routine MRI in characterization of brain tumours and helps to differentiate among different histopathological diagnoses. Mean Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA levels showed significant association with histopathological diagnosis. Mean Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA levels were minimum in low grade tumours and maximum in meningioma/ metastasis cases.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *