Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2019 Month : March-April Volume : 8 Issue : 2 Page : RO22 - RO24

Efficacy of Sonosalpingography and Hysterosalpingography in the Diagnosis of Infertility – A Comparative Evaluation

Correspondence Address :
Greeta Mathews, Mohammed Ahetasham,
Dr. Mohammed Ahetasham,
Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Dr. BR. Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru-560045, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: ahetasham@ymail.com
Introduction: Introduction: Infertility is a leading psychosocial problem in couples. Diagnostic evaluation of uterine tube is important in the management of infertility.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of Sonosalpingography (SSG) and Hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Materials and Methods: A total 50 cases attending the department with complaint of infertility between age group 2nd to 4th decades were recruited for this study. All the cases were undergone with baseline transabdominal sonogram, real time transvaginal sonography and saline infusion sonography to examine pelvic region of the cases. All the participants had to undergo SSG on 8th day and HSG on 10th day of the menstrual cycle. Data was collected and sensitivity and specificity of SSG over HSG was assessed. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS software version 16.0.

Results: Diagnosis by SSG showed bilateral tubal patency in 84% cases and by HSG showed bilateral tubal patency in 70% cases. SSG and HSG both correlated well (95.3%) and both procedures had similar diagnostic accuracy. SSG has 95.6% Positive Predictive Value (PPV), 94.9% Negative Predictive Value (NPV), 98.5% Sensitivity and 85.1% specificity in comparison to HSG. The outcome of this study indicates that there is no statistically significant difference (p=0.338) between the values of SSG and HSG.

Conclusion: SSG is cost effective and radiation free procedure. The outcome of SSG is almost similar to the values of HSG.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *