Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

2023
Year :2023 Month : July-August Volume : 12 Issue : 4 Page : SS05 - SS08

Medial Plantar Artery Flap for Reconstruction of Weight-bearing Sole Defect- A Series of Ten Cases

Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61663.2913
Correspondence Address :
Sanjay Gordhanbhai Vaghani, Ganesh Sadashiv Chaudhari,
Dr Ganesh Sadashiv Chaudhari,
Polt No. 45, Vasanti Society, Omkarnagar, Mhasarul-Makhamalabad, Link Road, Nashik-422004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drganeshchaudhari76@gmail.com
Introduction: Weight-bearing areas of feet are at risk of developing ulcers due to various reasons like a neuropathic foot in diabetes mellitus, acute trauma, post-tumour excision etc., Various reconstructive options have been described in literature from split-thickness skin graft to free flap. This case series reports 10 patients with sole defects. Out of 10 patients, seven patients had heel defect and three patients had the plantar aspect of the forefoot defect. For patients with heel defect, authors used a proximally based medial plantar flap as a reconstructive tool while for forefoot sole defect distally based (reverse) Medial Plantar Artery (MPA) flap was used. The most common cause of heel defect was postdebridement defect in diabetic foot in five cases, postmelanoma excision defect in three cases, postsquamous cell carcinoma excision defect in one case and postelectric burn defect in one case. Flap size ranged from 5x5 cm to 10×7 cm. All flaps offered stable, durable, and cosmetically acceptable skin cover. No patient had a recurrent ulcer during follow-up period. Partial flap necrosis in one case was managed conservatively. The MPA flap offers excellent cover which is a sturdy, durable, cosmetically acceptable cover for medium size defect over the sole i.e., the weight-bearing part of forefoot and heel.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *