Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

2024
Year :2024 Month : March-April Volume : 13 Issue : 2 Page : RO08 - RO14

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-detector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Non-traumatic Acute Abdominal and Pelvic Emergencies: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: March 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68067.2979
Correspondence Address :
R Mohan Kumar, Anupam Jhobta, Sumala Kapila, Shruti Thakur, Sushma Makhaik, Neeti Aggarwal, Charu S Thakur,
Shruti Thakur,
Keleston, Shimla-171001, Himachal Pradesh, India.
E-mail: tshruti878@yahoo.in
Introduction: Introduction: Acute abdomen can sometimes be life-threatening and requires an exact diagnosis and appropriate management to avoid mortality among patients. Multi-detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) provides a specific diagnosis and the whole picture of pathology, especially in patients with inconclusive diagnoses.

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of MDCT in diagnosing non-traumatic acute abdominal and pelvic emergencies.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients who presented with acute abdomen and had inconclusive diagnoses based on clinical examination, laboratory investigations, and other imaging modalities. MDCT was performed with a specific protocol depending on the clinical diagnosis. The MDCT results were compared with intraoperative findings, clinical recovery, and Histopathological Examinations (HPE). Data was entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.

Results: The MDCT diagnosis was concordant in 95% of patients and discordant in 5% of patients. Acute appendicitis was the most common cause of acute abdomen (20%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in diagnosing the aetiology of acute abdomen were 96.49% (CI 87.89% to 99.57%), 97.67% (CI 87.71% to 99.94%), 98.21% (CI 90.45% to 99.95%), 95.45% (CI 84.53% to 99.44%), and 97%, respectively.

Conclusion: Since the clinical findings overlap in patients with acute abdomen, making an accurate clinical diagnosis is challenging. In these cases, MDCT provides a diagnosis with high accuracy and specificity in a short duration of time; hence, MDCT should be performed in acute abdominal emergencies for appropriate patient management.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *