Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2015 Month : July-August Volume : 4 Issue : 3 Page : 1 - 5 Full Version

Correlation of Gallstone Characteristics with the Clinical Parameters in Cases of Cholelithiasis


Hemlata Sharma, Ghanshyam Gupta, Manoj Kumar Sharma
1. Lecturer, Anatomy, Jhalawar medical College, Jhalawar (Rajasthan) and Ph.D Scholar in Anatomy at R.N.T Medical College, Udaipur. (Rajasthan), India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, R.N.T Medical college, Udaipur.(Rajasthan), India. 3. Associate Professor, Anatomy, Jhalawar medical College , Jhalawar (Rajasthan), India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Mrs. Hemlata Sharma,
Lecturer, Anatomy, III/5,Staff quarters, Medical College
Campus, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan-
326001, India.
E-mail: hemlatasharmajmc@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Cholelithiasis means the “presence of stone in the gall bladder” is a common clinical entity affecting the adult population of both sexes. Various sign and symptoms like severe pain in Murphy’s point in right upper quadrant of abdomen, bilious vomiting, mild to moderate increase in temperature, obstructive jaundice, loss of appetite and weight are present in cholelithiasis. Gallstones are known to produce diverse histopathological changes in the gall bladder.

Aims: The study was undertaken to assess prospectively the influence of physical, clinical and biochemical characteristics on type of gallstones and their relationship in patients of cholelithiasis.

Materials and Methods: The study was done in hundred patients of cholelithiasis of both sexes, aged between 12 years to 80 years who underwent cholecystectomy. The stones were assessed for various parameters i.e. number, size, morphological types and correlated with clinical Indices of cases (Haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, Blood sugar, SGOT, SGPT, Alkaline phosphatase, total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin, Indirect serum bilirubin , total serum protein and albumin values) and also with diabetes mellitus ,smoking, tobacco chewing, alcohol intake and dietary habits of cases of cholelithiasis.

Results: Out of total 100 specimens examined in present study, 24 had cholesterol (male-4, female-20), 46 had mixed (male-11, female-35) and 30 had pigmented (male11, female-19) gallstones respectively. Number of stones varies from a single calculus in 30% cases, double in 12% cases and multiple in remaining 58% of cases. Shape of stone varied from polygonal/rectangular in 1% cases, ovoid in 15%, rounded in 22%, irregular in 29% and maximum had faceted shaped gallstone in 32% of cases. Haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, Blood sugar, SGOT, SGPT, Alkaline phosphatase, total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin, Indirect serum bilirubin, total serum protein and albumin values did not showed statistically significant correlation with gallstone types. The mean systolic BP (p<0.27) and the mean diastolic BP (p<0.012) in patients having cholesterol, mixed and pigmented gallstones showed statistically significant association with gallstone types.

Conclusion: Mixed gallstones more common among females and association of biochemical indices needs further exploration. Therefore gender, ethnicity and other clinical features can be used as the factor to predict the formation of gallstones disease. It is also recommended that all patients should go through the analysis of all the biochemical parameters before cholecystectomy.
Keywords : Black pigment, Cholecystitis, Cholesterol stone, Gall bladder, Gallstone disease, Mixed stone
DOI and Others : ID: IJARS/2015/13696:2046


Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2015

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.
 
INTRODUCTION

The gall bladder is stimulated to contract and expel the bile in to the duodenum by the hormone Cholecystokinin Pancreozymin (CCK) produced by the endocrine cells of the duodenal mucosa in response to food (Norman S. Williums, Bailey and Loves, 25th edition) (1). The inner surface of bladder is covered by mucosa with simple columnar epithelium with microvilli, Muscularis mucosa and submucosa are absent in gall bladder. Mucus glands are only present in the neck region of gall bladder (2).

Cholelithiasis has been described as a disease of civilization. It is observed in Egyptian mummies dating as far back as 3400 B.C. It appears likely that Charaka (2nd century B.C.) and Sushruta (6th Century B.C.) from India were also familiar with this disease of the biliary tract (3),(4).The severity of gallstone disease has previously been shown to related to gallstone type and particularly septic complications are much more common in patients with pigment gallstones than in patients with cholesterol gallstones (5),(6).

Various sign and symptoms like severe pain in Murphy’s point in right upper quadrant of abdomen, bilious vomiting, mild to moderate increase in temperature, obstructive jaundice, loss of appetite and weight are present in cholelithiasis (7).

Cholecystitis and cholelithiasis are very common particularly in fatty, fertile and female in 40. Gallstones are a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The prevalence varies with age, sex and ethnic group. Most people are unaware of the disease and remain asymptomatic for whole life (7).

Three types of stones are identified (8) as –

(a) Cholesterol stone- Radiolucent light yellow to dark green colour stone, 2 to 3 cm in length and oval shaped. They are more likely to respond to non surgical management than pigment or mixed stones (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

(b) Pigment stone- They are formed by the crystallization of calcium bilirubinate, black and brown coloured, usually multiple, small and hard in consistency associated with infection in the gall bladder, commonly found in Asian descent (Table/Fig 3).

(c) Mixed stone- Radiographically visible, commonest type formed by calcium carbonate, palmitate phosphate, bilirubin and other bile pigments (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Gallstone disease is a common problem worldwide including India. It is commonly believed that bile stasis is the prime factor for formation of gall stone (9). The function of gall bladder not only to store bile but also to concentrate it during the inter digestive phase by means of self dependent water re absorption. Risk factors for gall stone formation are (10). –

1 Advancing age 2 Sex- prevalence rate of cholelithiasis is higher in women of all age groups. 3 High fat diet. 4 Genetics. 5 Bariatric surgery.

Cholelithiesis produces diverse histopathological changes in gall bladder mucosa namely acute inflammation, glandular hyperplasia, granulomatous inflammation, cholesterosis, dysplasia and carcinoma (11).

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The present study was undertaken to correlate various gallstone characteristics (number, size, and morphological types,) with clinical indices of cases (Haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, Blood sugar, SGOT, SGPT, Alkaline phosphatase , total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin, Indirect serum bilirubin , total serum protein and albumin values) and also with diabetes mellitus, smoking, tobacco chewing, alcohol intake and dietary habits.
 
 
Material and Methods

Gall bladder of 100 patients ( Male – 26, Female – 74) aged between 12 years to 80 years were obtained from Department of General Surgery, R.N.T Medical College and attached M.B. Government Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstone disease with chronic cholecystitis after due approval of research project by Institutional Ethical Committee .

Physical characteristics of stones were noted as per the following parameters:

Type : Based on morphology

Number: Single/double/ multiple.

Size: Average of two major diameters with a Vernier caliper (accuracy: 0.01 cm). In the event of multiple stones, the diameter of largest and smallest stone were recorded.

Statistical analysis was performed by using Chi-square test for tables and proportions.
 
 
Results

Out of total 100 specimens examined in present study, 24 had cholesterol (male-4, female-20), 46 had mixed (male11, female-35) and 30 had pigmented (male-11, female-19) gallstones. Number of stones varies from a single calculus in 30% cases, double in 12%cases and multiple in remaining 58% cases. Shape of stone varied from polygonal/rectangular in 1% cases, ovoid in 15%, rounded in 22%, irregular in 29% and maximum had faceted shaped gallstone in 32% of cases. The average weight of patients having cholesterol stone was 63.500 kg, with mixed stone 65.93 kg ,and with pigmented stone 62.76 kg and association of weight with types of gallstones was statically not significant (p>0.3666) (Table/Fig 6).

Clinical and biochemical correlations

The incidence of diabetes mellitus (9%), smoking (7%), tobacco chewing (11%), alcohol intake (10%) and dietary habits (veg. - 66%, mix. - 34%) were noted at the time of admission of patients for cholecystectomy. No statistical association observed between the types of gallstones and above mentioned clinical features (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

Haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, Blood sugar, SGOT, SGPT, Alkaline phosphatase, total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin, Indirect serum bilirubin, total serum protein and albumin values are shown in (Table/Fig 9). No significant correlation between the gallstone type and biochemical values were detected in present study (Table/Fig 9).

The mean systolic BP were 131.25 mmHg, 123.43 mmHg and 120.90 mmHg in patients having cholesterol, mixed and pigmented gallstones respectively. This parameter was statistically significant (p<0.27) (Table/Fig 9).

The mean diastolic BP was 83.08, 78.86 and 76.66 in patients having cholesterol, mixed and pigmented gallstones respectively. The association of this parameter with gallstone types was statistically significant (p<0.012) (Table/Fig 9).
 
 
Discussion

Gallstone formation results from many complex factors working together. The pathologic factor related to gallstone formation is still the hot debate. Bile stasis secondary to gall bladder dyskinesia is the most widely accepted theory. The study demonstrated that mixed type of gallstones account for about 46% of stones found in cholecystectomized patients, mainly in females and the ratio of male & female was 1:3. It is consistent with the reports of Bruce W. Trotman et al., (12) and Harshi T W Weerakoon et al., (14) and Aslam H.M. et al., (14).

Raised values of SGPT and alkaline phosphatase were observed in present study which is as similar as the findings of Aslam H.M. et al, 2013 (14) so, the occurrence of gallstones was positively correlated with rise in SGPT levels.

It is also proved that obese women secretes more cholesterol into their bile then a non obese female (15). In present study, the incidence of Diabetes, Alcoholism, smoking, Tobacco chewing, Dietary habits in cases do not predispose to either type of gallstone formation. These findings are similar with the results of Harshi T W Weerakoon et al., (14) and Sherlock (16) .

Gallstone disease appeared to be increasing in incidence over past couple of decades in India and western world due to increased intake of fatty and high calorie diet and increased consumption of alcohol (17).

It was observed that despite the diverse mechanism of stone induction and the differences before in stone composition, there is a quantitative increase in the epithelium mucus production in the period stone formation.
 
 
Conclusion

Gallstones appear to be most important risk factor being reported in 70 % to 98% cases of gall bladder cancer and it is the most common cancer of biliary tree and 5th most common gastrointestinal malignancy. This present prospective study confirms that femininity and obesity are strongly associated with gallstones formation presumably due to excess cholesterol in bile which eventuates in cholecystectomy at a mean age from 39 years to 45 years.
 
 
Acknowledgement

I am extremely thankful to my supervisor Dr. Ghanshyam Gupta, Professor & Head, Department of Anatomy, R.N.T Medical College, Udaipur, India for the precise guidance and valuable suggestions without which it would not have been possible to start and finish this Research work.

Dr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India helped me in quite a lot of leg work during research period.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Norman S. Williums, Bailey & Love’s. Short practice of Surgery, 25th edition, 2008.
2.
Mohan H. Extra biliary apparatus-Gall bladder (Text book of pathology. chapter 19, 5th edition, 658-64. 2005.
3.
Mathur SK, Duhan A, Singh S, Agarwal M, Aggarwal G, Sen R, et al. Correlation of Gallstone characteristics with mucosal changes in gallbladder. Tropical Gastroenterology. 2012; 33 (1):39-44.
4.
Prakash A. Chronic cholecystits and cholelithiasis in india. Int. Surg. 1968;49:79-85.
5.
Mohan H, Punia RPS, Dhawan SB, Ahal S, Sekhon MS. Morphological spectrum of gallstone disease in 1100 cholecystectomies in north India. Indian J. Surg. 2005;67:140- 42.
6.
Bernhoft RA, Pellegrini CA, Motson RW, et al. Composition and morphologic and clinical features of common duct stones. AM.J.Surg.1984;148.77-85.
7.
Pani J.P, Pandey M S ,Pani D S, Maderakar M N and Katti H K. Estimation of predominate histologic alterations in cholecystitis and cholithiasis of human gallbladder an analytical and statistical study through the approach of routine histochemistry. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013;6(6):35-43.
8.
Kim HJ, Kim JS, Kim KO, park KH, Kim JY et al. expression of MUC3 ,MUC5A, MUC6 and epidermal growth factor receptor in gallbladder epithelium according to gallstone composition. Korean Journal Gastroenterol. 2003;42: 330-36.
9.
Meyer G, Guizzardi F, Rodighiero S, Manfredi R, Saino S, Sironi C, et al. Ion transport across the gallbladder epithelium. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord. 2005; 5:143- 51.
10.
Aust S, Obrist P, Jaeger W, Klimpfinger M, Tucek G, Wrba F, et al. Thalhammer T Subcellular localization of the ABCG2 Transporter in normal and malignant human gallbladder epithelium. Lab Invest. 2004; 84: 1024-36.
11.
Kouroumalis E, Hopwood D, Ross PE, Milne G, Bouchier IA. Gallbladder epithelial acid hydrolases in human cholecystitis. J Pathol. 1983; 139: 179-91.
12.
Bruce W.Trorman and Roger D. Soloway. Pigment vs cholesterol cholelithiasis : clinical and Epidemiological Aspects. Am .J . of Digestive Diseases .1975;20(8):735-40.
13.
Weerakoon H, Ranashinge S, Navaratna A, Sivakanesan A, Galketiya KB, Rosairo S. Can the type of gallstone be predicted with known possible risk factors?: A comparison between mixed cholesterol and black pigment stones. Gastroenterology. 2014;14:88.
14.
Aslam HM, Saleem S., Saleem M. Assessment of gallstone predictor: comparative analysis of Ultrasonographic and biochemical Parameters. Int Arch Med. 2013, 6:17.
15.
Grundy SM, Duane WC, Adler RD, Aron JM, Metzger AL. Biliary lipid outputs in young women with cholesterol gallstones. Metabolism.1974;23:67-74.
16.
Sherlock S. Diseases of liver and biliary tract, 4th Edition, 1968, Blackwell, Oxford, London.
17.
Carey MC. Pathogenesis of gall stone. Am J surg. 1993; 165: 410-14.  [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8] [Table/Fig-9]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *