Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case report

Year :2018 Month : January-February Volume : 7 Issue : 1 Page : RC01 - RC03 Full Version

CT Imaging of Left Renal Vein Anomaly-Circumaortic Variant


Adiraju Karthik, Holebasu, Bhushan N Lakhkar
1. Postgraduate, Department of Radiology, Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Hospital, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 2. Postgraduate, Department of Radiology, Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Hospital, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Reasearch Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Karthik Adiraju,
Department of Radiology, Shri BM Patil Medical College,
BLDE University, Bijapur-586103, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: mickeykarthik2@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Renal vascular anatomy can be of various variants. These variants are rare and are of clinical importance predominantly in abdominal and retroperitoneal surgeries. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis of these variants aiding in surgeries. We report a case of 27-year-old male patient with vague abdominal pain, referred for a contrast enhanced MDCT where incidentally two renal veins draining the left kidney into the inferior vena cava was found on contrast study suggesting a circumaortic left renal vein. It is of clinical significance, mainly during retroperitoneal surgeries, renal transplantations and intra caval interventions. We present this case since it is a relatively rare condition which can result in Left Renal Vein Hypertension (LRVH) syndrome.
Keywords : LRVH syndrome, Posterior nutcracker syndrome, Retro-aortic vein, Venous anomalies
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2018/32104:2346

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2018
 
Case Report

A 27-year-old male presented to our Radiology Department for a CECT abdomen with complaints of vague abdominal pain since two months. Pain was intermittent and non radiating in nature, predominantly in the epigastric region with no aggravating or relieving factors. Patient gave history of similar episodes of pain with lower severity in the past, which was relieved on medication. No other relevant medical or surgical history was reported. On physical examination patient was stable and his vitals were within normal range.

Further, with a written consent, a contrast enhanced abdominal MDCT scan was performed using 32 slice MDCT. It showed no significant pathology other than the incidental finding of two renal veins draining the left kidney into the inferior vena cava. They were seen ventral and dorsal to the abdominal aorta forming a collar pattern around it just inferior to the celiac artery (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2). The ventral vein passes in front of the aorta at the level of L1 vertebral body, the dorsal vein runs downward and medially behind the aorta at the level of L1-2 (Table/Fig 3). The diameter of ventral renal vein was found to be smaller than the dorsal vein. The dorsal branch was seen indented by the aorta. Complete filling of both the renal veins was seen during the venous phase of study. No other vascular anomalies were noted. On imaging it was confirmed with diagnosis of circumaortic left renal vein.

Patient was conservatively managed and was suggested for another scan if symptoms worsen in the form of haematuria and recurrent left flank pain which might indicate atypical form of Nutcracker syndrome due to increased venous pressure leading to venous hypertension (1) which then requires surgical intervention. Since, in our case as there was no such evidence neither clinically nor on imaging patient was discharged after managing conservatively. The prognosis was good in our case at current state and patient was kept under regular follow-up.
 
 
Discussion

Embryology: Venous anomalies, mainly results from the errors of the embryological development. The development of the renal veins is a part of developmental process of inferior vena cava. The process starts from the fourth week of intrauterine life and ends at the eighth week (2).

These are in the order of appearance; the posterior cardinal veins, the subcardinal veins (by 5th week) and the supracardinal veins. The subcardinal veins are noted ventral to the aorta where as supracardinal veins are noted dorsally. These veins form a venous collar around the aorta through interconnecting veins (3).

By regression and persistence of these veins, the four segments of the inferior vena cava (4) are formed:

Hepatic part: from hepatic vein and hepatic sinusoids,

Prerenal part: from right subcardinal vein,

Renal part: from anastomosis between subcardinal and supracardinal veins.

Postrenal part: from right subcardinal vein.

From the anastomosis of these subcardinal and supracardinal veins two veins are formed,one ventrally and other dorsally. Of these the dorsal vein degenerates usually and the ventral vein persists and forms the renal vein (5).

Both circumaortic and retroaortic left renal veins are the result of persistence of the dorsal limb of the embryonic left renal vein and of the dorsal arch of the renal collar. However, in retroaortic left renal vein the ventral arch regresses so that a single renal vein passes posterior to the aorta.

Retroaortic renal vein is noted to be of two types- Type I develop from the persistence of the left supracardinal anastomosis, the intersupracardinal anastomosis, and the dorsal left renal vein, with degeneration of the ventral renal vein. Type II is formed by the persistence of the left subsupracardinal anastomosis and the left supracardinal vein.

Clinical importance: The venous drainage of retroperitoneal region is of particular importance mainly in surgeries, lymphadenectomy, placement of IVC filters, tumour staging and vascular extensions of tumours in the retroperitoneal region. Improper knowledge, unawareness of venous anatomy and its anomalies during retroperitoneal surgery may injury the veins and can lead to complications like severe bleeding, at times nephrectomy and death. Compared to the patients with IVC anomaly the risk of injury is higher in patients with circumaortic renal collar. Hence, diagnosis of any venous anomalies is of utmost importance prior to retroperitoneal surgeries (6).

Easy surgical manipulation owing to the larger length of the left renal vein, infrequent incidence of additional left renal veins which when encountered are of small caliber and can be ligated easily. Hence knowing the left renal course is important prior to surgeries (7),(8).

Role of imaging: Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis of renal vein anomalies. Various modalities that can be used include ultrasound with doppler study, CECT, CTangiography, DSA and MRI contrast which helps in confirming the diagnosis.

CECT helps in better identification and tracking of vascular course in various phases. It also helps in identification of other significant pathologies with enhancement patterns and extensions. It is rapid procedure. However, contrast allergies, renal failure, pregnancy and excessive radiation are few disadvantages.

CT-angiography may give more precise anatomical detail than MRI, particularly in small blood vessels using special software and reviewed in different planes and projections with 3D reconstructed images. Invasive nature and cost makes this modality less approachable.

DSA helps in segmental approach, better distinguishable contrast flow, can be performed outpatient basis. However, the limitations hold the same as of CECT (9),(10),(11),(12).

MRI contrast been a non-radiation scan helps in delineation of vascular pathology with better soft tissue resolution. However, contrast allergies, long scan duration time and cost are the major limitations.

In our case where the patient was referred for CECT and incidentally circumaortic left renal vein was found with no necessity of further evaluation using other modalities.
 
 
Conclusion

Detailed knowledge about congenital anomalies of the left renal vein is important to make distinctive diagnosis of renal vascular pathologies and to impede complications which occur during retroperitoneal vascular surgical procedures. Imaging plays a major role in diagnosis of these anomalies. With our case we suggest renal vein anomalies should also be considered as a differential diagnosis in patient with vague abdominal pain when no other significant pathology is found. Ultrasound with Doppler study should be the first modality of choice in suspected cases followed by contrast enhanced MDCT for confirming the diagnosis as in this case.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Nam JK, Park SW, Lee SD, Chung MK. The clinical significance of a retroaortic left renal vein. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(4):276-80.
2.
Moore KL. The Developing Human Clinically Oriented Embryology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company:1998. p. 352-55.
3.
Prakash C, Ali S, Khan SM. Anomalous left renal vein coursing behind aorta and draining into the left common iliac vein: A rare variant. Int J Case Rep Images. 2014;5(8):553-57.
4.
Meyer DR, Huppe T, Andresen R, Friedrich M. Intra- and infrahepatic agenesis of the inferior vena cava with azygos continuation accompanied by duplication of the postrenal segment. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:113-16.
5.
Gupta A, Gupta R, Singal R. Congenital variations of renal veins: embryological background and clinical implications. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5:1140-43.
6.
Tatar I, Tore HR, Celik HH, Karcaaltncaba M. Retroaortic and circumaortic left renal veins with their CT findings and review of the literature. TSACA Anatomy. 2008;2:72-76.
7.
Satyapal KS, Kalideen JM, Singh B, Haffejee AA, Robbs JV. Why we use the donor left kidney in live related transplantation. S Afr J Surg. 2003;41(1):24-26.
8.
Babian RJ, Johnson DE. Major venous anomalies complicating retroperitoneal surgery. South Med J. 1979;72:1254-58.
9.
Mulligan PR, Prajapati HJS, Martin LG, Patel TH. Vascular anomalies: classification, imaging characteristics and implications for interventional radiology treatment approaches. The British Journal of Radiology. 2014;87(1035):20130392.
10.
Yesildag A, Adanir E, Koroglu M, Baykal B, Oyar O, Gulsoy UK. Incidence of left renal vein anamolies in routine abdominal CT scans.Tani Girism Radyol. 2004;10:140-43.
11.
Trigaux JP, Vandroogenbroek S, De Wispelaere JF, Lacrosse M, Jamart J. Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9(2):339-45.
12.
Parikh SJ, Peters JC, Kihm RH. The anomalous left renal vein: CT appearance and clinical implications. J Comput Tomogr. 1981;5:529-32.  [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *