Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case Series

Year :2022 Month : January-February Volume : 11 Issue : 1 Page : RS01 - RS05 Full Version

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Preoperative Cases of Esthesioneuroblastoma (Olfactory Neuroblastoma): A Case Series


Mohit Rameshrao Lohey, Satish D Patil, Shivanand V Patil, Ravikumar, Vishal S Nimbal, Suresh Kanamadi
1. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Shri. B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mohit Rameshrao Lohey,
Room No. 103, Hostel No. 2, BLDE Campus, Solapur Road,
Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: mohitlohey@yahoo.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Esthesioneuroblastoma is an uncommon aggressive tumour arising from the olfactory epithelium of superior nasal cavity, frequently invading the base of cranium, cranial vault and orbit. Contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) and contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were done for three patients which showed modified Kadish stage C tumour. Biopsy was done to confirm the diagnosis and patients were subjected to surgery and radiotherapy. The purpose of this case series was to report the radiological features of esthesioneuroblastoma. This is a report on three cases of different age groups who presented tumour with intracranial extension which were histopathologically proven as esthesioneuroblastoma.
Keywords : Chemotherapy, Nasal cavity, Radiotherapy, Surgery
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2022/46064:2725

Date of Submission: Jul 23, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Oct 05, 2020
Date of Acceptance: Jan 27, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

b#bAuthor Declaration:b?b
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 26, 2020
• Manual G
 
INTRODUCTION

Esthesioneuroblastoma is also known as olfactory neuroblastoma (neuroectodermal tumour), these are uncommon malignant tumours originating in the olfactory epithelium in the superior nasal cavity of olfactory recess. Approximately, the incidence of esthesioneuroblastoma is 4 per 10,00,000 cases. A wide range of age groups can present with esthesioneuroblastoma and frequently in a bimodal distribution, occurring most frequently in the second and sixth decades. There is no racial predilection to esthesioneuroblastoma (1). Commonly, males are seen affected more than females with esthesioneuroblastoma. The male to female ratio is approximately 1.2:1 (2),(3),(4),(5).

Most of the patients are locally diagnosed with advanced stages of the disease and hence, requires multimodality treatment in form of surgery, chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy.
 
 
Case Report

Case 1

A young female in her third decade (27 years) presented with a mass in right nasal cavity, nasal bleeding and anosmia for a year. She underwent a lot of medications, but showed no improvement, recently she felt difficulty in breathing and severe frontal headache which were unresponsive to pain killers. On examination, a huge fleshy polypoidal mass was visible in right nasal cavity with non preservation of normal anatomy of nasal cavity and bleed with touch. Examination of the left nasal cavity, mouth, ears, neck and cranial nerves were within normal limited.

MRI with T1 axial and coronal sections, T2/FLAIR (Fluid Atenuated Inversion Recovery) axial sections and T1 post-gadolinium (contrast) axial and coronal sections were achieved. An isointense expansile mass lesion was noted in right nasal cavity with destruction of ethmoid air cells on T1WI (Table/Fig 1)a causing widening and destruction of right cribriform plate. FLAIR sequences showed significant perilesional oedema (hyperintensities), causing buckling and mass effect over the bilateral basi-frontal neuroparenchyma (Table/Fig 1)b. Postcontrast the lesion shows adjacent peritumoural cyst (Table/Fig 1)c with heterogeneous pattern of enhancement (Table/Fig 1)d. On Histopathological Examination (HPE) tumour cells were arranged in lobular pattern and large islands of small cells (Table/Fig 2).

Case 2

A 60-year-old male came to Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) clinic and presented with history of headache, anosmia, episodic epistaxis, epiphora, left sided nasal blockage for a year and an episode of involuntary movements of both upper and lower limbs. He was treated symptomatically for a year without any improvements. Recently, he developed balance disorder with an episode of seizure. On examination of nasal cavity, a pale colored soft fragile mass obliterating left nasal cavity bleed with touch. The assessment of sensory neuron and motor responses, especially reflexes were assessed and were unremarkable. Cold spatula test did not show fogging on left side. The patient was a known hypertensive and chronic smoker. Lab investigation such complete blood count, liver function test and renal function test were unremarkable.

CT of para-nasal sinuses and brain was performed with axial, coronal and saggital reformation which showed an expansile irregular soft tissue density mass lesion (Hounsfield unit 14 to 20) in left nasal cavity involving left maxillary and sphenoid sinus (Table/Fig 3)a causing obliteration of ostiomeatal complexes and extending superiorly intracranially into basi-frontal region crossing the midline. Destruction and thinning of left ethmoid air cells, left maxillary sinus walls, nasal septum, left inferolateral part of crista galli with widening and erosion of cribriform plate on left side (Table/Fig 3)b,c are extending posteriorly upto nasopharynx (Table/Fig 4)a.

On non contrast CT [Table/Fig-4b] there was a hypodense mass lesion with few cystic areas in frontal lobe in midline. On post-contrast (iohexol) CT, a large heterogeneously enhancing mass (Hounsfield unit 55 to 68) in left nasal cavity and sinuses (Table/Fig 5)a,b have seen extending intracranially in left frontal region crossing midline with adjacent peritumoural cyst ((Table/Fig 5)c arrowhead) with enhancing walls and significant peri-lesional oedema (Table/Fig 5)d,e. No evidence of intra-lesional calcifications/haemorrhage/intra-orbital extensions.

On HPE examination, scant vesicular cytoplasm and scattered rosettes along with fibrillary matrix and mitotic activity with no evidence of necrosis was observed ((Table/Fig 6) red-arrow).

Case 3

A 35-year-old female came with the complaints of nasal obstruction and increasing swelling over left cheek region and headache for a year. Recently, she developed severe recurrent epistaxis and complete anosmia and severe headache which was not relived with painkiller. No previous medical treatment or surgery was performed. On examination, a fleshy pinkish mass was visible in left nostril causing completely occupying left nasal cavity and firmed, non tender swelling with ill-defined margins over the left cheek and maxillary region and loss of smell sensation. There was no rise in local temperature in left cheek region. Cold spatula test did not show fogging on left side. Blood profile was within normal limits of complete blood count, liver function test and renal function test.

CT of para-nasal sinuses and brain was performed with axial, coronal and sagittal reformation which showed an ill-defined irregular heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion in left nasal cavity. The maxillary sinus completely obliterates left nasal cavity and extends to anterior cranial fossa through the cribriform plate. The lesion was causing destruction to medial wall of left maxillary sinus, uncinate process, superior, middle, inferior turbinate, nasal septum and superiorly cribriform plate (Table/Fig 7)a-c.

The heterogeneous mass lesion shows diffusion restriction on Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) (Table/Fig 8)a with corresponding coronal and sagittal images (Table/Fig 8)b,c. MRI with T1 axial and coronal sections, T2/FLAIR, DWI, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Gradient Echo (GRE) axial sections and T1 post gadolinium (contrast) axial and coronal sections were achieved which showed an irregular heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion in left nasal cavity superiorly extending intracranially to anterior cranial fossa eroding cribriform plate on left side causing obliteration of fronto-ethmoidal recess and retention of secretions in left maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses with downward and lateral displacement of left middle and inferior turbinates (Table/Fig 9),,(Table/Fig 10).

A nasal cotton gauze soaked in a mixture of 5 mL of lidocaine 1% and 1 mL of adrenalin 1:50,000 is inserted in nasal cavity on the same side of lesion at an ear, nose and throat clinic then the biopsy specimen was taken under topical anesthesia. All the above three cases were diagnosed as esthesioneuroblastoma. HPE showed tumour cells arranged in lobular pattern and large islands of small cells, having a hyperchromatic nucleus with inconspicuous nucleolus, (Table/Fig 11). Differentials were olfactory neuroepithelioma and sinonasal carcinoma on imaging appears identical to esthesioneutoblastoma; however peritumoural cysts are uncommon in latter.
 
 
Discussion

Esthesioneuroblastoma is an unusual (1-5% of all nasal tumours) and destructive malignant neurogenic tumour located in the nasal cavity. Since, its initial description in 1924 by Berger and Luc (6) more than 1,000 cases of esthesioneuroblastoma were reported worldwide (7). Symptoms are associated with the site of origin and extension/invasion of the tumour. Kadish S et al., 1976 accord tumour extensions as stage A, B, and C (8). Later, Morita A et al., added stage D tumours as metastases in cervical lymph nodes and distant sites (9). Biller HF et al., Dulguerov P and Calcaterra T are other two staging methods used (10),(11). The groups A-D are described below-
Group A: Mass lesion limited to the nasal cavity

Group B: Mass lesion limited to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses

Group C: Mass lesion extending beyond the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses such as intracranial/intraorbital extension

Group D: Cervical nodal metastases

All three patients presented with Stage C in present study according to Kadish S et al., (8) with intracranial extension. The age group in present series showed patients ranged between 21 and 65 years old. There is still a lack of consensus over the incidence in both genders. Some reported that esthesioneuroblastoma affect male and female patients equally (12), some thought that it is slightly more common in males (13),(14),(15),(16) or otherwise (17). In general, the clinical symptoms of esthesioneuroblastoma were not specific and related to tumour sites and invasion (18). The commonest presenting symptoms were unilateral nasal obstruction and anosmia in index study. Due to its vague symptoms and slow growing nature, esthesioneuroblastoma patients often have a long history of progressive symptoms for months, prior to diagnosis (11). The average duration from symptom onset to management was 1 year in index study and six months (0–18 months) in the USA, reportedly (13). This study established that MRI and CT manifestation of esthesioneuroblastoma are imprecise, sharing similar signal intensity and density features an enhancement patterns with other nasal neoplasms (19),(20). The predominant site of primary tumour was the roof of nasal cavity in the region of the cribriform plate, laterally above the middle turbinate. Rare sites of initial incidence such as the sellar and parasellar region, nasopharynx, maxillary and sphenoid sinuses were not seen in this series (21),(22),(23),(24). Locally, esthesioneuroblastoma extended laterally and upwards to the paranasal sinuses or medially to the contralateral nasal cavity and into the cranial cavity or fossa orbitalis. Furthermore, esthesioneuroblastoma can also metastasise by lymphatic and haematogenic routes. It is reported that approximately 5% of patients have cervical lymph node metastasis with a cumulative cervical metastases rate of 25% or so (3),(25) and approximately 10-30% of patients will develop distant metastases to the central nervous system (about 20-30%), lung, liver, skin, eye, bone, and parotid (20),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30). In present study, lymph nodes metastases were not seen. This report mainly concentrated on these three cases with direct intracranial extension and categorised them into three types based on the depth of invasion: brain parenchyma (Kadish Group C) (3/3), other types being in nasal cavity (Grade A) or para-nasal sinuses (Grade B). The brain parenchyma type had the primary tumour extend across the cribriform plate, growing through the dura and then infiltrate into the anterior frontal lobe. Even though the bulk of the tumour may lie intracranial, it is still attached to the cribriform plate.

Compared with the gray matter, the tumour parenchyma appears T2/FLAIR hyperintense and hypointense on T1-weighted images. FLAIR image exhibits the peritumoural oedema more clearly, but gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images visualise the tumoural boundary due to significant enhancement of all involved soft tissues. Peri-tumoural cysts (arrowhead in (Table/Fig 5)c) along the intracranial tumour margin are portrayed clearly. MR and CT images show that the tumour located at high in the nasal cavity extending through the left cribriform plate and invading the ipsilateral frontal lobe. Peri-tumoural cyst (arrows) along the margin of the intracranial tumour is portrayed clearly. Pre-contrast coronal CT image shows a hyperdense endonasal mass with slight high density to the surrounding soft tissue. Post-contrast coronal CT image shows the tumour enhances significantly and heterogenously.

No intra-lesional calcification can be considered pathognomonic for esthesioneuroblastoma. Presence of intracranial cysts in a sino-nasal mass with CNS extension is highly suggestive of esthesioneuroblastoma (31). The base-of-skull type was revealed in three cases, where bulging duramater were demonstrated and thinned or destroyed cribriform complex were discovered during surgery. Due to the high aggressive behaviour and recurrence rate (28),(32) of esthesioneuroblastoma, early diagnosis, accurate staging and close follow-ups are essential for optimistic patient management (33). In these aspects, both MR and CT scanning are helpful in providing necessary information as to the tumour location and extension and proximity to the adjacent structures.
 
 
Conclusion

Esthesioneuroblastomas presented as expansible intranasal lesions that unilaterally widens the olfactory recess. CT/MRI can help predict extent and staging of tumour, guide extent for biopsy, potentially helpful in choosing appropriate initial operative management.

This analysis of the case series of esthesioneuroblastomas suggests that intracranial extension and peritumoural cysts are more commoner and anosmia being the commonest symptom.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Shirzadi AS, Drazin DG, Strickland AS, Bannykh SI, Johnson JP. Vertebral column metastases from an esthesioneuroblastoma: Chemotherapy, radiation, and resection for recurrence with 15-year followup. Case Reports in Surgery. 2013;2013:107315.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Ward PD, Heth JA, Thompson BG, Marentette LJ. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Results and outcomes of a single institution’s experience. Skull Base. 2009;19(2):133.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Diaz Jr EM, Johnigan III RH, Pero C, El-Naggar AK, Roberts DB, Barker JL, et al. Olfactory neuroblastoma: The 22 year experience at one comprehensive cancer center. Head & Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2005;27(2):138-49.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Resto VA, Eisele DW, Forastiere A, Zahurak M, Lee DJ, Westra WH. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The Johns Hopkins experience. Head & neck. 2000;22(6):550-58.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Bachar G, Goldstein DP, Shah M, Tandon A, Ringash J, Pond G, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The Princess Margaret hospital experience. Head & Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 2008;30(12):1607-14.   [Google Scholar]
6.
Irish J, Dasgupta R, Freeman J, Gullane P, Gentili F, Brown D, et al. Outcome and analysis of the surgical management of esthesioneuroblastoma. The Journal of Otolaryngology. 1997;26(1):01-07.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Arnold PM, Habib A, Newell K, Anderson KK. Esthesioneuroblastoma metastatic to the thoracic intradural and extradural space. The Spine Journal. 2009;9(5):e01-05.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang CC. Olfactory neuroblastoma- A clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer. 1976;37(3):1571-76.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Morita A, Ebersold MJ, Olsen KD, Foote RL, Lewis JE, Quast LM. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Prognosis and management. Neurosurgery. 1993;32(5):706-15.   [Google Scholar]
10.
Biller HF, Lawson W, Sachdev VP, Som P. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Surgical treatment without radiation. The Laryngoscope. 1990;100(11):1199-201.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Dulguerov P, Calcaterra T. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The UCLA experience 1970–1990. The Laryngoscope. 1992;102(8):843-49.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F. Since the discovery of the tumour in 1924. Anticancer Research. 1997;17(26832706):2683-706.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Hwang SK, Paek SH, Kim DG, Jeon YK, Chi JG, Jung HW. Olfactory neuroblastomas: Survival rate and prognostic factor. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2002;59(3):217-26.   [Google Scholar]
14.
Simon JH, Zhen W, McCulloch TM, Hoffman HT, Paulino AC, Mayr NA, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The University of Iowa experience 1978–1998. The Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):488-93.   [Google Scholar]
15.
Zafereo ME, Fakhri S, Prayson R, Batra PS, Lee J, Lanza DC, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: 25-year experience at a single institution. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2008;138(4):452-58.   [Google Scholar]
16.
Devaiah AK, Larsen C, Tawfik O, O’Boynick P, Hoover LA. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Endoscopic nasal and anterior craniotomy resection. The Laryngoscope. 2003;113(12):2086-90.   [Google Scholar]
17.
Castelnuovo PG, Delù G, Sberze F, Pistochini A, Cambria C, Battaglia P, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Endonasal endoscopic treatment. Skull Base. 2006;16(1):25.   [Google Scholar]
18.
Gondim J, Ramos Jr F, Azevedo J, Carrero Jr FP, Tella Jr OI. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Case report. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2002;60(2A):303-07.   [Google Scholar]
19.
Dulguerov P, Allal AS, Calcaterra TC. Esthesioneuroblastoma: A meta-analysis and review. The Lancet Oncology. 2001;2(11):683-90.   [Google Scholar]
20.
Bradley PJ, Jones NS, Robertson I. Diagnosis and management of esthesioneuroblastoma. Current opinion in Otolaryngology & Head And Neck Surgery. 2003;11(2):112-18.   [Google Scholar]
21.
Chacko G, Chandi SM, Chandy MJ. Primary sphenoid and petrous apex esthesioneuroblastoma: Case report. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 1998;12(3):264-66.   [Google Scholar]
22.
Sarwar M. Primary sellar-parasellar esthesioneuroblastoma. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1979;133(1):140-41.   [Google Scholar]
23.
Mashberg A, Thoma KH, Wasilewski EJ. Olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroepithelioma) of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 1960;13(8):908-12.   [Google Scholar]
24.
Castro L, De La Pava Sa, Webster Jh. Esthesioneuroblastomas: A report of 7 cases. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1969;105(1):7-13.   [Google Scholar]
25.
Yu T, Xu YK, Li L, Jia FG, Duan G, Wu YK, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma methods of intracranial extension: CT and MR imaging findings. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(12):841-50.   [Google Scholar]
26.
Wick W, Wick A, Küker W, Dichgans J, Weller M. Intracranial metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma responsive to temozolomide. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2004;70(1):73-75.   [Google Scholar]
27.
Dias FL, Sá GM, Lima RA, Kligerman J, Leôncio MP, Freitas EQ, et al. Patterns of failure and outcome in esthesioneuroblastoma. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2003;129(11):1186-92.   [Google Scholar]
28.
Constantinidis J, Steinhart H, Koch M, Buchfelder M, Schaenzer A, Weidenbecher M, et al. Olfactory neuroblastoma: The University of Erlangen-Nuremberg experience 1975-2000. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2004;130(5):567-74.   [Google Scholar]
29.
Lund VJ, Howard D, Wei W, Spittle M. Olfactory neuroblastoma: Past, present, and future? The Laryngoscope. 2003;113(3):502-07.   [Google Scholar]
30.
Levine PA, Gallagher R, Cantrell RW. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Reflections of a 21-year experience. The Laryngoscope. 1999;109(10):1539-43.   [Google Scholar]
31.
Som PM, Lidov M, Brandwein M, Catalano P, Biller HF. Sinonasal esthesioneuroblastoma with intracranial extension: Marginal tumour cysts as a diagnostic MR finding. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1994;15(7):1259-62.   [Google Scholar]
32.
Loy AH, Reibel JF, Read PW, Thomas CY, Newman SA, Jane JA, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Continued follow-up of a single institution’s experience. Archives of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery. 2006;132(2):134-38.   [Google Scholar]
33.
Jethanamest D, Morris LG, Sikora AG, Kutler DI. Esthesioneuroblastoma: A population-based analysis of survival and prognostic factors. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2007;133(3):276-80.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8] [Table/Fig-9] [Table/Fig-10] [Table/Fig-11]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *