Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2022 Month : January-February Volume : 11 Issue : 1 Page : SO09 - SO12 Full Version

Role of Laparoscopic Fundoplication in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease- A Retrospective Study


Bhanu Prasad Nagula, Abhishek Vodnala
1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nizamabad, Telangana, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Siddipet, Telangana, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Abhishek Vodnala,
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Siddipet, Telangana, India.
E-mail: abhiv97@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disease affecting 3-7% of Asians and becoming a major healthcare burden in elderly population. Surgical intervention with laparoscopic fundoplication is the effective tool in the management of GERD.

Aim: To evaluate the role and advantages of laparoscopic fundoplication in the management of cases with GERD and to compare the laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication in management of GERD.

Materials and Methods: The present retrospective and prospective study was conducted in the Department of General surgery at Government Medical College, Nizamabad from August 2019 to July 2021. A total of 36 cases of both sexes, clinically diagnosed as chronic GERD undergone laparoscopic Nissen’s fundoplication and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication surgery were recruited. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of disease status was done at the end of third month and sixth month. Collected data was analysed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The chi-square test was used to test the significance of qualitative data. The The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: In total data collected for 36 cases, majority cases were between 31-40 years (n=13) and 41-50 years (n=11). Total of 19 patients had undergone laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication while 17 patients were of laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication surgery. The mean difference of age was statistically not significant (p>0.05). Postsurgical significant improvement was observed in cases of grade 3 (n=7), grade 4 (n=19) and grade 5 (n=10) oesophagitis. The mean duration to start oral liquids was 1.29 days and 1.08 days, mean duration of surgery was 3.62 hours and 3.19 hours, mean duration of hospital stay was 4.12 and 3.67 days and the average ambulatory period was 1.46 and 1.62 days in laparoscopic nissen’s group and laparoscopic toupet’s group, respectively.

Conclusion: The laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication were comparable in the management of postoperative complications. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was comparatively more in laparoscopic Nissen’s group than laparoscopic toupet’s group. However, the incidence was diminished within six months of postoperative follow-up.
Keywords : Dysphagia, Nissen’s technique, Oesophagitis, Postoperative complications, Toupet’s technique
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2022/52759.2751

Date of Submission: Oct 08, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 14, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METH
 
INTRODUCTION

The GERD is frequently under diagnosed and is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly cases (1),(2). The prevalence of GERD was approximately 20% of adults in Western culture and 18.1% to 27.8% in US (3). In India, the prevalence of GERD was 7.6% to 30% (4). The GERD occur when the gastric content refluxes into the oesophagus and develops a spectrum of typical symptoms like heartburn, dysphagia, regurgitation and blenching and atypical symptoms like chest pain, hoarseness of voice, laryngitis, wheezing, cough, dental complications, aspiration pneumonia and asthma (3).

The successful outcome of surgery depends on the proper patient selection with typical and atypical symptoms. Complete lifestyle change and prolonged therapy are the first line treatment choice for the management of GERD. Besides this, laparoscopic fundoplication is the standard surgical treatment option for GERD (5). Laparoscopic total or nissen’s fundoplication (3600) is commonly performed anti-reflux operation for the management of severe GERD (6),(7). However, postsurgical complications like dysphagia and gas bloating have been reported (8),(9). Laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication or partial fundoplication (270°) had similar control of reflux and is associated with fewer incidences of postoperative complications (10). The important goals of laparoscopic fundoplication is to improve quality of life, relieving patient from complications and relieving from GERD symptoms. A study by Chrysos E et al., reported that both techniques were equally effective and comparable in the management of GERD (11). A study by Qin M et al., reported diverse outcome between both techniques (12). In order to recommend the better anti-reflux surgery which results better postoperative outcome in this departmental setup, the present study was designed to evaluate the role and advantages of laparoscopic fundoplication in the management of cases with GERD.
 
 
Material and Methods

This retrospective and prospective study was conducted in the Department of General surgery at Government Medical College and Hospital, Nizamabad, Telangana, India, from August 2019 to July 2021. The retrospective data was collected from August 2019 to March 2020 and prospective data was collected from July 2020 to July 2021. The study protocol was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of Government Medical College, Nizamabad (No. GMCH/IRB-IEC/2019/Jun/18P).

Inclusion criteria: Cases aged between 25 to 65 years, refractory to treatment, with clinical reflux symptoms, Barrett’s oesophagus, with chest pain, chronic cough and asthma were included.

Exclusion criteria: Cases with history of previous oesophageal surgery and short oesophagus, ulcers were excluded.

All the patients who undergone laparoscopic nissen’s and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication between August 2019 to July 2021 in the Department of General Surgery were included as sample size.
Patient’s data was collected from medical records. A total of 36 cases of both sexes, clinically diagnosed by General Surgeon as chronic GERD undergone laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (n=19) and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication (n=17) surgery were recruited (6). The above procedure was chosen with the investigator and departmental interest.

Procedure

All the study participants were subjected to detailed clinical and radiological examination preoperatively and postoperatively. The oesophagoscopy was used to assess the severity of oesophagitis pre and postoperatively after obtaining the patient’s informed consent.
Preoperative barium swallow was performed in cases complained with dysphagia. The preoperative and postoperative status at third and sixth month of symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, asthma, chest pain was evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms like heartburn, dysphagia and regurgitation were checked by DeMeester scoring system. The DeMeester scoring system is commonly used scoring system for acid reflux. This is the scoring system to measure oesophageal acid exposure based on 24 hours pH scoring (13). The severity of oesophagitis was evaluated by upper GI endoscopy and the severity grading was assessed by New Savary-Millers grading system (Table/Fig 1) (14).

The parameters like duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, average ambulation period and time to start the oral liquids were noted. Details of pre and postoperative usage of medication was recorded. Postoperative assessment of oesophagitis was performed by oesophagoscopy. Postoperative assessment of disease status was done at the end of third month and sixth month. Postoperative clinical examination and repeat UGI endoscopy was done for all the cases.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Extracted data was statistically analysed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The chi-square test was used to test the significance of qualitative data. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
 
 
Results

Among 36 cases, majority cases were between 31-40 and 41-50 years (Table/Fig 2). The mean difference was statistically not significant.

The better improvement was observed in the grades of oesophagitis after surgery. All the cases in grade 3, grade 4 and grade 5 before surgery showed improvement after surgery (Table/Fig 3).

There was a significant improvement in the different grades of heartburn, dysphagia, regurgitation and epigastric pain at the sixth month of follow-up (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 4). The preoperative and postoperative assessment of hoarseness, and chest pain showed significant improvement at sixth month follow-up (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

Intraoperative complications like herniation and pneumothorax was observed in two cases each. The mean duration to start medication of oral liquids was 1.29 days, mean duration of surgery was 3.62 hours and the average ambulation period of stay was 1.46 days for laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (Table/Fig 6). The postoperative assessment for incidence of dysphagia showed improvement at third month and sixth month follow-up. Laparoscopic toupet’s group showed better improvement than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (Table/Fig 7). The development of persistent dysphagia immediately after surgical procedure is leading cause of procedure failure. With this reason, this study was focused more on dysphagia.
 
 
Discussion

The mean difference of age was statistically not significant (p-value=
0.269) (Table/Fig 2). The significant postoperative improvement was observed in the grades of oesophagitis. Preoperatively, all the cases were in grade 3 (19.4%), grade 4 (52.7%) and grade 5 (27.7%) oesophagitis and showed significant improvements after surgery. Cases were completely relieved from preoperative heart burn, regurgitation and epigastric pain at six months after surgical procedure. Preoperatively, 15 cases had various grades of dysphagia and at the end of sixth month, 34 cases were relieved from dysphagia.

Symptoms like cough, hoarseness of voice, chest pain and asthma were observed in 8,3,12 and 7 cases respectively before surgery. Postoperatively, at the end of sixth month, only one case showed cough and one case had asthma. A study by Wang B et al., found no difference in the incidence of symptoms like dysphagia, heartburn and regurgitation between laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (15). The prevalence of postoperative dysphagia and gas related symptoms were comparatively higher in laparoscopic nissen’s than laparoscopic toupet’s group (16). The postoperative recovery of acute dysphagia occurs immediately, mild dysphagia recovers within 6-8 weeks and chronic dysphagia recovers after 6-8 weeks (17),(18).

Intraoperative complications like herniation and pneumothorax was observed in two cases each. The mean duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and starting oral liquid consumption was comparatively higher in laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication than laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication. However, the average ambulation period of stay was less in laparoscopic nissen’s than laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication. A study by Chrysos E et al., noticed prolonged operative duration in laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication (90±12 minutes) than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (67±15 minutes) (11). Erenoglu C et al., stated that the laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication and laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication was comparable in terms of operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, length of hospitalisation, need for reoperation, and efficacy in terms of relieving symptoms. However, laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication was effective and safe procedure in the management of severe form of the GERD diseases (19).

A study by Wang B et al., stated that laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication was effective and safe on long-term use than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication. However, laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication has lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia (15). A study by Chrysos E et al., stated that laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication was associated with fewer functional symptoms, 11which was reduced and become similar with the laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (11).

A study by Jose WH et al., stated that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an effective treatment modality for the long-term management of GERD (20). A study by Zoring C et al., stated that laparoscopic toupet’s procedure is the better treatment modality, which has low rate of dysphagia and effective in controlling reflux than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (21). A study by Su F et al., stated that laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication was better procedure than laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication in reducing the number of reflux episodes and decreasing postoperative dysphagia (22).

A study by Qin M et al., stated that the incidence of dysphagia was significantly low in laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication may be optimal for moderate to severe GERD (12). A study by Koch OO et al., stated that laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication are equally effective in the management of GERD and improving the quality of life of cases. However, the reoperation rate and dysphagia rate were lower and ability to belch was higher after laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (23). Marzia E et al., concluded that laparoscopic fundoplication is advisable only for those proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responsive GERD cases who develops complications (24). In the present study, laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication were effective treatment modalities in the management of GERD. However, laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication is efficient in diminishing the incidence of the postoperative dysphagia than laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication (Table/Fig 7).

Limitation(s)

In view of limitations, the present study was non randomised with minimal sample size and with less postoperative follow-up period due to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Further, prospective evaluations needed to know the detailed impact of laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication in the management of GERD.
 
 
Conclusion

The results of present study concluded that the laparoscopic toupet’s fundoplication and laparoscopic nissen’s fundoplication were comparable in the management of postoperative symptoms. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was comparatively more in laparoscopic nissen’s group than laparoscopic toupet’s group. However, the incidence was diminished within six months of postoperative follow-up.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Richter JE. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the older patient: Presentation, treatment, and complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(2):368-73.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Agresta F, De Simone P, Leone L, Arezzo A, Biondi A, Bottero L. Italian Society Of Young Surgeons (SPIGC): Laparoscopic appendectomy in Italy: An appraisal of 26,863 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14(1):01-08.   [Google Scholar]
3.
El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871-80.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Bhatia SJ, Makharia GK, Abraham P, Bhat N, Kumar A, Reddy DN. Indian consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: A position statement of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38(5):411-40.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Salminen P. The laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication-a better operation? Surgeon. 2009;7(4):224-27.   [Google Scholar]
6.
Frazzoni M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Frazzoni L, Melotti G. Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14272-79.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Morais DJ, Lopes LR, Andreollo NA. Dysphagia after antireflux fundoplication: Endoscopic, radiological and manometric evaluation. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(4):251-55.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Ribeiro MC, Tercioti-Júnior V, Souza-Neto JC, Lopes LR, Morais DJ, Andreollo NA. Identification of preoperative risk factors for persistent postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013;26(3):165-69.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Owers C, Ackroyd R. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia: Overview and authors’ perspective. J Surg. 2013;1(4):51-58.   [Google Scholar]
10.
Arivan R, Deepanjali S. Prevalence and risk factors of gastro-esophageal reflux disease among undergraduate medical students from a southern Indian medical school: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):448.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Zoras OJ, Athanasakis E, Mantides A, Katsamouris A. Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: Total or partial fundoplication? J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(1):08-15.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Qin M, Ding G, Yang H. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(7):601-04.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Liu S, Xu M, Yang J, Qi H, He F, Zhao X, et al. Research on gastroesophageal reflux disease based on dynamic features of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal ph monitoring. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2017;2017:9239074.   [Google Scholar]
14.
Genta RM, Spechler SJ, Kielhorn AF. The Los Angeles and Savary-Miller systems for grading esophagitis: Utilization and correlation with histology. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2011;24(1):10-17.   [Google Scholar]
15.
Wang B, Zhang W, Liu S, Du Z, Shan C, Qiu M. A Chinese randomised prospective trial of floppy Nissen and Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal disease. Int J Surg. 2015;23(Pt. A):35-40.   [Google Scholar]
16.
Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Granderath UM, Pointner R. Gas-related symptoms after laparoscopic 360 degrees Nissen or 270 degrees Toupet fundoplication in gastro oesophageal reflux disease patients with aerophagia as comorbidity. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39(4):312-18.   [Google Scholar]
17.
Wykypiel H, Bonatti H, Hinder RA, Glaser K, Wetscher GJ. The laparoscopic fundoplications: Nissen and partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication. Eur Surg. 2006;38:244-49.   [Google Scholar]
18.
Novitsky YW, Wong J, Kercher KW, Litwin DE, Swanstrom LL, Heniford BT. Severely disordered esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(6):950-54.   [Google Scholar]
19.
Erenoglu C, Miller A, Schirmer B. Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int Surg. 2003;88(4):219-25.   [Google Scholar]
20.
Jose WH, Sebastian V, Sorin M, Angel GSP, Esteban S. Long-term effectiveness of laparoscopic antireflux surgery as treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Adv Res Gastroentero Hepatol. 2020;15(5):555925.   [Google Scholar]
21.
Zornig C, Strate U, Fibbe C, Emmermann A, Layer P. Nissen vs toupet laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(5):758-66.   [Google Scholar]
22.
Su F, Zhang C, Ke L, Wang Z, Li Y. Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Zhonghua wei Chang wai ke za zhi=Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016;19(9):1014-20.   [Google Scholar]
23.
Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA, Luketina RR, Emmanuel K, Pointner R. Comparison of results from a randomised trial 1 year after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2383-90.   [Google Scholar]
24.
Frazzoni M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Frazzoni L, Melotti G. Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14272-79.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *