Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2023 Month : January-February Volume : 12 Issue : 1 Page : SO14 - SO16 Full Version

Effectiveness of Collagen Dressing in Second Degree Paediatric Burns: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study


Sushanth Shivaramegowda, Peddi Manjunath, Karthik Adithya
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Peddi Manjunath,
364, 8th Cross, Padmanabhanagar, Bengaluru-560070, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: peddim@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Most common cause of burns in paediatric age group is scalds. Though intentional paediatrics burns are reported, usually they are caused by accidental spillage of hot water. Along with fluid management, major part of managing burns involves repeated dressings. Biological dressings like collagen are impervious to bacteria and create the most biological interface between the wound surface and the environment, ensuing in better healing.

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of collagen dressings in second degree paediatric burns.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study done at Mahabhodhi Burns Centre, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, from January 2018 to December 2019, included 75 second degree paediatric burns patients. Re-epithelialisation rates, infection and progress to full thickness burns were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software v.23.

Results: Out of 75 children, 8 (10.7%) of children had complete re-epithelisation by seven days, 55 (73.3%) between 8-14 days and 4 (5.3%) between 14-21 days. Total 67 (89.3%) of children had complete epithialisation by 21 days, with mean of 9.5 days.

Conclusion: Overall, collagen dressing helps in preventing infection, early re-epithelisation, and avoids painful dressings. It minimises the psychological trauma on both patients as well as their parents.
Keywords : Burn dressing, Re-epithelialisation, Scald burns, Second degree burns
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/57181.2866

Date of Submission: Apr 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 04, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval Obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 24, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 02, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

Paediatric burns, are unintentional disaster. Though intentional paediatrics burns are reported, usually they are caused by accidental spillage of hot water. Other causes of paediatric burns are thermal burns, scalds due to hot oil spillage, direct contact with hot surfaces and cracker burns (1). Burn injuries in children is a major epidemiological problem around the globe. Nearly a fourth of all burn injuries occur in children under the age of 16, of whom the majority are under the age of five (2),(3). Skin in children is thinner, tolerates less heat, hence full-thickness injury occurs even with short duration of exposure (4).

When moist wound bed and adequate circulation are maintained and there is no infection, deep partial thickness injury has the capacity to heal well. In the absence of the overhead factors, a partial-thickness burn wound changes into a full thickness wound (5).

Bacterial infection is a major problem which delays healing, increases pain and the risk of scarring. Along with fluid management, major part of managing burns involves repeated dressings. Biological dressings like collagen are impermeable to bacteria and create the most physiological interface between the wound surface and the environment (6). Advantages of collagen dressing over conventional dressings are: ease of application and being natural, non immunogenic, non pyrogenic, hypoallergenic, and pain-free (7).

Preservation of overall homeostasis is the primary goal of management. Major burn injury results in local damage from the inciting injury and if inadequately treated leads to multi system failure. Hence, wound care is a crucial aspect of treatment. Regular dressing changes and aggressive wound debridement are instrumental for early recovery. These measures protect the wound from further infection, provides comfort, and promotes healing (8). It should be noted that a variety of dressings exist including standard fine mesh gauze, hydrocolloid, silver containing dressings, biosynthetic, and biologic dressings (9),(10),(11).

Type I collagen is the main type of collagen in the skin. Chemically, bovine collagen is remarkably similar to the human form. Collagen sheets derived from bovine tissues comprise mostly Type I and III collagens (3). Collagen dressings have other advantages over regular dressings in terms of ease of application and being natural, non immunogenic, non pyrogenic, hypo allergenic, and subsequent pain-free dressings (12). Once applied, it does not need frequent dressing change, effectively reducing number of dressing changes under anaesthesia.

The present study was conducted with an aim to determine the effectiveness of collagen dressings in second degree paediatric burns.
 
 
Material and Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at Mahabhodhi Burns Centre, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, during January 2018 to December 2019. Seventy-five second degree paediatric burns patients were included. Informed consent was obtained from all parents (4). Convenience sampling was adopted and all the patients who fit into the inclusion criteria and who came during the study period were included.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria was less than 12 years of age, second degree burns, presentation before 72 hours, no signs of infection, burn surface area less than 35%. Rule of nine was used to calculate the Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) of burns (1). Children with full thickness burns, clinically infected burns, electric burns, delayed presentation beyond 72 hours and burns surface area more than 35% were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

After admission, initial fluid management was done. After stabilisation, under general anaesthesia wound was thoroughly cleaned, blisters were deroofed, wet collagen sheet of bovine origin in a sterile preserving solution was washed multiple times in normal saline. Meshed collagen sheets were applied over burnt area and fixed with absorbable suture when required. Over this, a layer of non-adherent gauze was applied followed by absorbent bulk dressing which was changed after three days to minimal or no dressing. As the wound started epithelialising, the collagen sheet dried, which was clipped off gradually. Re-epithelialisation rates, infection and progress to full thickness burns were evaluated. Re-epithelialisation was assessed by separation of collagen from the wound. Presence of purulent discharge below the collagen dressing was considered as infected wound. Wounds that failed to heal after three weeks were considered as full thickness burn wounds.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis were done using SPSS v.23. Descriptive statistics was used and results were expressed in terms of frequency and percentages.
 
 
Results

Out of 75 children, 42 children were male, 33 were female. Mean age of the patients was 5.04 years. Most common cause of burns was scalds, which constituted 69 (92%) followed by 6 (8%) of flames burns. In the present study 60 (80%) of children had ≤20% of TBSA involved (Table/Fig 1).

Total 8 (10.7%) of children had complete re-epithelisation by seven days, 55 (73.3%) between 7-14 days and 4 (5.3%) between 14 to 21 days (Table/Fig 2). Mean time of complete epithelisation with separation of collagen from wound was 9.5±3.29 days.

Total 67 (89.3%) of children had complete epithelisation by 21 days (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2). About 5 (6.7%) progressed to deep or full thickness burns requiring surgery, and 3 (4%) developed infection, subsequently collagen was removed (Table/Fig 3). No mortality was seen among the patients in the study. (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6) showed illustration of few cases which shows complete re-epithelisation.
 
 
Discussion

Collagen is a biomaterial that helps in wound healing through deposition and organisation of freshly formed fibres and granulation tissue in the wound bed thus creating a favourable environment for wound healing (12).

Collagen sheets, when applied to a wound promotes angiogenesis and also enhances body’s repair mechanisms. While acting as a mechanical support collagen reduces oedema, prevents loss of fluids from the wound site and facilitates migration of fibroblasts into the wound, which further enhances the metabolic activity of the granulation tissue (11),(12).

In the present study, out of 75 patients, no mortality was seen. Scalds was the most common cause of burns, which is a common finding in most studies (1),(2),(5),(7). Mean time of complete epithelialisation with separation of collagen from wound was 9.5 days. (Table/Fig 6) shows complete re-epithelialisation in eight days following collagen application in partial thickness burns. In a study done by Mehta MA et al., the mean complete healing time was 7.476 for collagen-based dressing and 12.88 for silver sulfadiazine-based dressing (13). Shettigar UR et al., in their study on animal models, showed that the collagen dressed burn wounds had faster epithelialisation with dense fibrous tissue in growth in the subdermal layers and little inflammatory change (14). Only three patients developed infection which required removal of collagen. Presence of infection was identified by the collection of purulent discharge underneath the collagen. Infection rate of 4% clearly signifies the effectiveness of collagen in burns wound healing. Church D et al., mentions “colonisation of burn wound occurs around 72-96 hours post burns, so early dressing with collagen helps in preventing infection, which may have devastating consequences in paediatrics age group (15).

Once done, collagen dressing doesn’t require dressing change till reepithelialisation completes, which helps in avoiding frequent painful dressing. This is particularly important in tertiary centres, where, due to over case load and shortage of staff, it’s not always possible to change the dressing under anaesthesia. Singer AJ and Thode HC Jr, quotes “Pain management is critical in the overall care of the burn injured patient. Severe pain is a major consequence of burn injury, and it has been demonstrated that it is often inadequately treated”. Anxiety and depression are confounding components in a major burn and can further decrease the pain threshold (16).

Mathangi Ramakrishnan K et al., also states that “Collagen dressing has many advantages like, ease of application and removal of the membrane after epithelisation, painless dressing, and costeffectiveness compared to Integra®, Biobrane® and Acticoat®” (17).

Being tertiary centre, most of our patients hail from distant places and they prefer staying till the wound heals completely, hence duration of admission was not included in our study.

A single stretch of membrane is not advisable to be placed on flexor surfaces as it cracks when it becomes dry and visible wound through the membrane may give rise to apprehension amongst care givers. One more disadvantage we have observed in our study is the difficulty in maintaining over all body hygiene when collagen dressing is used for smaller surface area of burns and collagen dressing is not suitable for gluteal and posterior thigh burns.

Limitation(s)

The study was limited by lack of long-term follow-up to asses scar quality and absence of comparison with other commonly used dressing materials.
 
 
Conclusion

Over all, collagen dressing helps in preventing infection and early re-epithelisation. It minimises the psychological trauma of both patients as well as their parents. Collagen dressing does not require great skills to master, being available easily, hence it should be the standard of care for burns dressing in paediatric patients.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Sheridan RL, Remensnyder JP, Schnitzer JJ, Schulz JT, Ryan CM, Tompkins RG. Current expectations for survival in pediatric burns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:245-49. Doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.3.245. PMID: 10710021. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.154.3.245#doi# ?pmid?10710021#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Krishnamoorthy V, Ramaiah R, Bhananker SM. Pediatric burn injuries. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2012;2(3):128-34. Doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.100889. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.100889#doi# ?pmid?23181206#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Waghmare M, Shah H, Tiwari C, Makhija D, Desale J, Dwivedi P. Collagen dressings in the management of partial thickness pediatric burns: Our experience. Indian J Burns. 2016;24:53-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-653X.195525. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-653X.195525#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
4.
Mariappan N. Collagen dressing for thermal burns. Sch J Appl Med Sci. 2015;3:58.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Singh O, Gupta SS, Soni M, Moses S, Shukla S, Mathur RK. Collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burn and chronic wounds: A retrospective study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4:12-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974- 2077.79180. PMID:21572675. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.79180#doi# ?pmid?21572675#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Purna Sai K, Babu M: Collagen based dressings: A review. Burns. 2000;26;54- 62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00103-5. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00103-5#doi# ?pmid?10630321#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Kennedy P, Brammah S, Wills E. Burns, biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis. Burns. 2010;36:49-56. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.02.017#doi# ?pmid?19523770#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Munster AM, Smith-Meek M, Sharkey P. The effect of early surgical intervention on mortality and cost-effectiveness in burn care, 1978-91. Burns. 1994;20:61- 64. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(94)90109-0. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(94)90109-0#doi# ?pmid?8148080#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD002106. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub3. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub3#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
10.
Delatte SJ, Evans J, Hebra A, Adamson W, Othersen HB, Tagge EP. Effectiveness of beta-glucan collagen for treatment of partial-thickness burns in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):113-8. Doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20024. PMID:11150448. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.20024#doi# ?pmid?11150448#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Park SN, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Suh H. Biological characterization of EDC-crosslinked collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix in dermal tissue restoration. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1631-41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00550-1. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00550-1#doi# ?pmid?12559823#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Lazovic G, Colic M, Grubor M, Jovanovic M. The application of collagen sheet in open wound healing. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005;18:151-56.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Mehta MA, Shah S, Ranjan V, Sarwade P, Philipose A. Comparative study of silver-sulfadiazine-impregnated collagen dressing versus conventional burn dressings in second-degree burns. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(1):215-19. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_291_18. PMID:30911509. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_291_18#doi# ?pmid?30911509#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Shettigar UR, Jagannathan R, Natarajan R. Collagen film for burn wound dressings reconstituted from animal intestines. Artif Organs. 1982;6(3):256-60. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.1982.tb01670.x. PMID:7181726. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.1982.tb01670.x#doi# ?pmid?7181726#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):403-34. Doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006. PMID:16614255. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006#doi# ?pmid?16614255#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr. National analgesia prescribing patterns in emergency department patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002; 23:361-65. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200211000-00001. PMID:12432312. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200211000-00001#doi# ?pmid?12432312#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Mathangi Ramakrishnan K, Babu M, Mathivanan, Jayaraman V, Shankar J. Advantages of collagen based biological dressings in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns in children. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013;26(2):98-104.  [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *