Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2024 Month : July-August Volume : 13 Issue : 4 Page : RO01 - RO04 Full Version

Role of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Cholesteatoma from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A Cross-sectional Study


Vasanthapriya Janarthanan, Thara Keloth, Joe Vimal Raj, Roshen Raghaventhar Raghuraman, Elamparidhi Padmanaban, Kamala Manogna Nibhanupudi
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Sri Venkateshwara Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Joe Vimal Raj,
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Madagadipet, Kalitheerthalkuppam, Puducherry-605107, India.
E-mail: jvrpetit@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Radiological imaging, such as High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bone, has always held significant importance in diagnosing and staging Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM). In preoperative cases of CSOM and cholesteatoma, HRCT describes the disease’s extent to aid in surgical approach, while diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences can differentiate cholesteatoma from other common inflammatory middle ear diseases.

Aim: To determine the role of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating between granulation tissue and cholesteatoma using histopathological findings as a reference standard.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College, Puducherry, India, from November 2018 to April 2020. A total of 40 patients who underwent HRCT of the temporal bone for preoperative evaluation of CSOM underwent diffusion sequence MRI, and their findings were compared with intraoperative and postoperative histopathological results. Findings such as soft-tissue masses with scutum and erosion of ear ossicles were analysed in HRCT, while diffusion restriction was observed in DW-MRI in cases of cholesteatoma. Data were collected using a prescribed proforma and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0.

Results: The mean±Standard Deviation (SD) age of the patients was 43±20.41 years (27 males, 13 females). The most common presentations in this study were mucopurulent discharge and conductive hearing loss (20 out of 40 patients). Among the 16 patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma through histopathological examination, all (100%) were reported to have diffusion restriction present in the MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of DWI were all found to be 100% in diagnosing cholesteatoma. The sensitivity of HRCT was 81.25% and the specificity was 83.3%.

Conclusion: High-resolution computed tomography provides a surgical roadmap indicating the extent of involvement and bony structures, while DW-MRI imaging helps in differentiating cholesteatoma from CSOM. A combined preoperative approach using HRCT and DW-MRI imaging can aid in diagnosing cholesteatoma effectively.
Keywords : Ossicular erosion, Restricted diffusion, Scutum erosion
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2024/66291.2996

Date of Submission: Jul 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 16, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 11, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 09, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 15, 2024 (17%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendations: 6
 
INTRODUCTION

Chronic suppurative otitis media is a chronic middle ear infection with or without discharge, often accompanied by a permanent perforation in the Tympanic Membrane (TM). Cholesteatoma is a benign lesion characterised by the abnormal accumulation of keratin-producing squamous epithelium and keratin fragments in the tympanic cavity and mastoid, causing local invasiveness and destruction of bony structures in the middle ear cavity (1).

The use of imaging methods, such as HRCT of the temporal bone, to differentiate cholesteatoma from other common middle ear inflammatory diseases remains controversial. Therefore, the diagnosis of cholesteatoma primarily relies on clinical presentation and otoscopic findings (2).

In HRCT, the evaluation of bony structure erosion, including the scutum, ossicular chain, lateral semicircular canal, fallopian canal and tegmen tympani/antri, can be performed more effectively. However, a major limitation of HRCT is its challenge in distinguishing cholesteatoma from other tissues like inflammatory tissue, polyps and exudate, especially when there is no air in the middle ear cavity and clear bone erosions are evident (3).

The MRI was previously utilised primarily for imaging inflammatory pathologies and suspected intracranial complications due to difficulties in visualising the anatomical landmarks of the temporal bone.

In conventional MRI sequences, cholesteatomas typically exhibit non specific signal intensities, appearing T1 hypointense/isointense and T2 hyperintense (2). However, cholesteatomas demonstrate restricted diffusion because of their high keratin content (4). Therefore, this limited-sequence MRI examination in addition to HRCT of the temporal bone may enhance the accurate diagnosis of this potentially hazardous yet treatable condition. In the present study, the aim was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing granulation tissue from cholesteatoma, with histopathological findings serving as a reference standard.
 
 
Material and Methods

The present study was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital (SMVMCH) in Puducherry, India, from November 2018 to April 2020. Institutional Ethical Committee approval (SMVMCH-ECO/AL/119/2018) was obtained. The sample size was determined based on the average total number of cases referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for preoperative assessment of CSOM and was fixed at 40 participants.

Inclusion criteria: All patients of any gender presenting with clinical features of CSOM such as chronic ear discharge and/or pain, referred to the Radiodiagnosis Department for preoperative assessment using HRCT were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of previous operations for CSOM and cholesteatoma, patients with metallic implants or pacemakers and patients with claustrophobia or anxiety disorders were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

After obtaining the patient’s history, the patient underwent HRCT of the temporal bone and a Diffusion-weighted MRI sequence. HRCT temporal bone studies were conducted on a 16-slice CT scanner (Philips MX-16) using an axial volume scan with a section thickness of 0.67 mm, 120 kV reconstruction interval of 0.3 mm, and reconstruction algorithm of 360°. The rotation time was 0.4s, and an image matrix of 768×768 was used.

Subsequently, patients underwent a diffusion-weighted sequence MRI using a 1.5 Tesla Philips whole-body MR system with a standard imaging head coil. Axial non echo-planar single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging was conducted with the following parameters: 5/1.5 mm slice thickness, TE: 124 ms, TR: 1000 ms, FOV: 160 mm, diffusion factor: B 1000 s/mm2. An acquisition time of 40s and a flip angle of 90 were utilised. The postprocessed Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) map was reconstructed. One week after the preoperative evaluation, surgery was performed. The findings were then compared postoperatively with histopathological reports.

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet and analysed using SPSS software version 24.0. Ordinal/discontinuous variables were presented as frequencies and proportions, while discrete/continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diffusion sequence were compared with the gold standard histopathology report by constructing a 2×2 table.
 
 
Results

Total of 40 patients were studied, of whom 27 (68%) were males and 13 (32%) were females, with a mean±SD age of 43±20.41 years. The age range of the study participants was 12-75 years (Table/Fig 1).

The majority of the study participants exhibited unilateral involvement (33/40), with a higher incidence on the left side (23/40) compared to the right side (17/40).

Participants presented with a combination of symptoms such as ear pain, pus discharge and conductive hearing loss. The most common clinical presentations were conductive hearing loss and pus discharge (20/40). Two patients with high fever and altered sensorium were diagnosed with brain abscesses based on imaging.

Using otoscopic findings, patients were categorised into safe (tubotympanic) and unsafe (atticoantral) types based on the type of TM perforation. The majority were classified as having the unsafe type, with 26 (65%) patients falling into this category (Table/Fig 2).

Preoperatively, HRCT of the temporal bone was performed, evaluating parameters such as the presence of a soft-tissue mass, erosion of the scutum and ear ossicles. In the present study involving 40 participants, all showed a soft-tissue density mass within the middle ear cavity (Table/Fig 3)a,b,c. Scutum erosion was observed in 20 (50%) patients and ossicular erosion was noted in 12 patients (30%) patients (Table/Fig 4)a,b.

Based on the presence of a soft-tissue mass, scutum erosion, ossicular erosion and the extent of the lesion, 17/40 (42.5%) participants were suspected to have cholesteatoma on HRCT. Subsequently, all study participants underwent diffusion-weighted sequence MRI, with 16 participants showing restriction (Table/Fig 5)a,b,c.

During intraoperative and postoperative follow-up, these 40 patients were monitored, and histopathology reports were evaluated. The 16 patients who exhibited restriction in diffusion imaging were confirmed to have cholesteatoma both intraoperatively and histopathologically (Table/Fig 6)a,b.

HRCT, when compared with DWI and gold standard histopathological findings, demonstrated 81.25% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, 76.5% PPV and 87% NPV.

Comparing DW-MRI imaging findings with intraoperative and postoperative histopathological findings, the DWI sequence in MR imaging exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity in differentiating cholesteatoma from CSOM preoperatively (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9).
 
 
Discussion

The mean age of presentation was found to be in the middle-age group (35-44 years) in various studies (5),(6),(7),(8). Similarly, in the present study, the average age of presentation was around 43 years with a male predilection.

Preoperative HRCT of the temporal bone revealed a soft-tissue mass in all participants, with erosion of the scutum seen in 50% and ossicular erosion in 30% of patients. Sagar JN and Devasamudra RC reported that in HRCT, cholesteatoma appears as a non dependent soft-tissue density with bony erosions, showing a high degree of accuracy for middle ear ossicular erosion (96.8%), incus erosion (96.4%) and malleus erosion (100%) (5).

In another prospective study by Gomaa MA et al., where they correlated intraoperative findings with preoperative HRCT findings, scutum and lateral attic wall were the most commonly eroded bony structures in the middle ear wall (64.3%) and incus was the most commonly eroded ossicle (88.2%) in cholesteatoma seen on HRCT (9). Similarly, in the present study, 20 patients had erosion of the scutum and 12 had ossicular erosion, all showing a soft-tissue mass.

A prospective study conducted by Abdelmaksoud AA et al., among 20 patients (9 males and 11 females) aged 15-35 years with a mean age of ±25 years, reported a sensitivity of 90.0%, specificity of 88.9%, and positive and negative predictive values of 90.9% and 88.9%, respectively, for diffusion-weighted imaging (10). Kailasanathan N et al., concluded that DW-MRI is more accurate in diagnosing cholesteatoma compared to HRCT, with 100% sensitivity and NPV, 75% specificity and 97.3% PPV (11).

The superior rate of cholesteatoma detection by DWI was also observed in the present study and other studies as shown in (Table/Fig 10) (4),(6),(7),(8),(10),(11). Therefore, a combination of preoperative HRCT of the temporal bone and DW-MRI imaging is useful in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma.

The DWI has the advantage of no radiation exposure, no contrast use and a short examination time. It can also differentiate scar tissue, granulation tissue, and inflammatory changes from cholesteatoma in patients with prior cholesteatoma resection, potentially avoiding the need for second-look surgery (2). Newer DWI techniques like Multishot Echo-Planar Imaging (MS-EPI) and Readout-segmented Echo-planar (RESOLVE) DWI with thinner section acquisition and reduced susceptibility artifacts allow for the detection of small lesions. Additional techniques such as coloured image-fusion of DWI and anatomic sequences help better demonstrate findings to patients or clinicians (12),(13),(14).

Limitation(s)

The sample size was small in the present study. Previously operated cases were excluded from the study; therefore, the importance of the DWI sequence in the evaluation of recurrence/retained disease was not assessed. The findings cannot be generalised, as it was a single centre study.
 
 
Conclusion

The HRCT of the temporal bone serves as the primary diagnostic imaging modality for the preoperative evaluation of middle ear pathologies such as cholesteatoma and CSOM; however, it is unable to differentiate between CSOM and cholesteatoma. The DWI sequence plays a significant role in distinguishing between cholesteatoma and CSOM, as cholesteatoma exhibits restricted diffusion. Therefore, the authors recommended a combined approach of HRCT and DW-MRI preoperatively for the evaluation of patients with CSOM and cholesteatoma.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Rout MR, Mohanty D, Vijaylaxmi Y, Kamalesh B, Chakradhar M. Prevalence of cholesteatoma in chronic suppurative otitis media with central perforation. Indian Journal of Otology. 2012;18(1):07-10. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-7749.98280#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
2.
Schwartz KM, Lane JI, Bolster BD, Neff BA. The utility of diffusion weighted imaging for cholesteatoma evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:430-36. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2129#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
3.
Henninger B, Kremser C. Diffusion weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of cholesteeatoma. World Journal of Radiology. 2017;9(5):217-22. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i5.217#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
4.
Naveen J, Chandrashekar HM, Udayakumar C, Shreyas Rao G. Role and utility of HRCT and MRI in detection and evaluation of cholesteatoma. Int J Radiol Diagn Imaging. 2019;2(2):119-22. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2019.v2.i2b.77#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
5.
Sagar JN, Devasamudra RC. Clinical study of correlation between preoperative findings of HRCT with intra-operative findings of cholesteatoma in cases of CSOM. Indian Journal of Anatomy & Surgery of Head, Neck & Brain. 2017;3(1):01-05. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.18231/2455-846X.2017.0001#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
6.
Yiğiter AC, Pinar E, Imre A, Erdoğan N. Value of echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting tympanomastoid cholesteatoma. J Int Adv Otol. 2015;11(1):53-57. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2015.447#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
7.
Dubrulle F, Souillard R, Chechin D, Vaneecloo FM, Desaulty A, Vincent C. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging sequence in the detection of postoperative recurrent cholesteatoma. Radiology. 2006;238(2):604-10. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381041649#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
8.
Aikele P, Kittner T, Offergeld C, Kaftan H, Hüttenbrink KB, Laniado M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of cholesteatoma in pediatric and adult patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003;181(1):261-65. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810261#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
9.
Gomaa MA, Karim ARAA, Abdel HS, Elhiny A, Sadek A. Evaluation of temporal bone cholesteatoma and the correlation between high resolution computed tomography and surgical finding. Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat. 2013;6:21-28. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.4137/CMENT.S10681#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
10.
Abdelmaksoud AA, Abd Elwahab S, Tayee U. Role of diffusion weighted imaging in diagnosis of cholesteatoma: A single centre study. SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021;4(2):90-98.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Kailasanathan N, Arunprasad S, Peters BS. The usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in cholesteatoma diagnosis and postoperative pathologic correlation. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology. 2016;5(1):29-32.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Yamashita K, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, Kamano H, Dashjamts T, Shibata S, et al. Detection of middle ear cholesteatoma by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Multishot echo-planar imaging compared with single-shot echo-planar imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1915-18. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2651#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
13.
Skare S, Newbould RD, Clayton DB, Albers GW, Nagle S, Bammer R. Clinical multishot DW-EPI through parallel imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(5):881-90. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21176#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
14.
Flook E, Izzat S, Ismail A. Cholesteatoma imaging using modified echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(1):10-12.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110001805#doi#  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8] [Table/Fig-9] [Table/Fig-10]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *